Allen_Appel
Second Unit
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2002
- Messages
- 418
If price were no object, I'd get the Monster cables myself. Just like I'd buy a $500 component switcher. But I don't believe the improvements I *might* see (I doubt I'm as discerning as other HTFers) are worth the cost. I think the difference is better spent elsewhere. Like on a game.
Bob, as you posted in another thread, component cables offer a 5% increase in clarity over S-video. How much of a visible increase can there be between Monster and Microsoft cables? Is it just a little bit better, or is it "Holy mother of God, I'll never game any other way again!"? I can't cite the reference, but I did read of a home theater magazine that tested component cables and found Monster was not as good as a cheaper brand. I think the visual shortcomings of videogames are one reason why higher-end cables might be self-defeating. Seeing my PS2 through component cables revealed a lot more jaggies than S-video did.
David, I don't know what the Avia cost is as I picked up Video Essentials discounted to $15, since there was supposed to be a new version released. Avia is the better disk, though.
Bob, as you posted in another thread, component cables offer a 5% increase in clarity over S-video. How much of a visible increase can there be between Monster and Microsoft cables? Is it just a little bit better, or is it "Holy mother of God, I'll never game any other way again!"? I can't cite the reference, but I did read of a home theater magazine that tested component cables and found Monster was not as good as a cheaper brand. I think the visual shortcomings of videogames are one reason why higher-end cables might be self-defeating. Seeing my PS2 through component cables revealed a lot more jaggies than S-video did.
David, I don't know what the Avia cost is as I picked up Video Essentials discounted to $15, since there was supposed to be a new version released. Avia is the better disk, though.