Would you spend more on AUDIO or VIDEO part of your HT?

Discussion in 'Archived Threads 2001-2004' started by Arnel Enero, May 7, 2002.

  1. Arnel Enero

    Arnel Enero Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    May 2, 2002
    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    On EXTREME ends, which HT would you rather live with -- one with sophisticated audio but only a small 24" direct-view TV, or one with budget audio components but with a sophisticated front-projection system with 12'+ screen width?
     
  2. Axel Wolfe

    Axel Wolfe Auditioning

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2002
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I would find it hard to spend as much on the video part of my home theater as i have on the audio. Even with a large projector, i wouldnt come close to what i have spent, and planing to spend on my audio.
    Axel[​IMG]
     
  3. Carl Johnson

    Carl Johnson Cinematographer

    Joined:
    May 6, 1999
    Messages:
    2,259
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Real Name:
    Carl III
    I'd take audio over video. I spend almost as much time listening to music as I do watching movies so the sound system gets twice as much exposure as the television. Besides, while I currently have a better than average sound system I doubt that I have the most impressive television on the block. It wouldn't take much to improve on a three year old 32" set, even one that is properly calibrated.
     
  4. DanaA

    DanaA Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2001
    Messages:
    1,843
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'd have to go with the audio portion too, although I couldn't live with a 24" TV. The reason is that audio components really excite me, as does buying them. It's been that way for many, many years. When I buy a home theater magazine, I never really look at the reviews of the televisions, but speakers, amps, receivers, subs are a different story. I just start thinking, "Oh, I'd really like to own that." Right now, I have a 55" Mitsubishi and Onkyo, Harmon Kardon, Klipsch, Hsu set up in my bedroom. When my daughter and I were watching Ali this weekend, I was constantly noticing how good the audio was and never noticed the technical part of the video that much.
     
  5. MartinTeller

    MartinTeller Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,721
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I spent $300 on my 30" TV, and I listen through the TV speakers.

    Given that choice, however, I would pick video. I live in an apartment and besides, I don't like things really loud anyway.
     
  6. AllanN

    AllanN Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2002
    Messages:
    950
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Video
     
  7. Brook K

    Brook K Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2000
    Messages:
    9,467
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Video, while my audio could use an upgrade, I'd much rather have a great looking, big picture. Most of the movies I watch are 2.0 or mono anyway. I rarely watch a disc that really shows off the weaknesses of my system.
     
  8. Patrick McCart

    Patrick McCart Lead Actor

    Joined:
    May 16, 2001
    Messages:
    7,596
    Likes Received:
    257
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Georgia (the state)
    Real Name:
    Patrick McCart
    Video.

    I'm very satisfied with my current audio setup (Capable of DD 5.1 and DTS 5.1) but I'd like a larger TV.

    I'd actually buy a 16x9 (when I in the financial shape to do so...) monitor just because I'd like to see Lawrence of Arabia, Moulin Rouge, Doctor Zhivago, Ben-Hur, and North By Northwest in full digital clarity. 0% overscan, too.
     
  9. Andrew_Sch

    Andrew_Sch Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2001
    Messages:
    2,153
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I would go with video, simply because I think my eyes are sharper than my ears. It must run in the family, since my dad bought a $2000 TV, but our entire surround system cost about $300, with all speakers and the sub at the low, low price of $100.
     
  10. Neil Joseph

    Neil Joseph Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 1998
    Messages:
    8,332
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Real Name:
    Neil Joseph
    As much as I love audio, I must admit that I have spent a great deal more on the video portion of my HT. Considering what decent projectors cost, if I had to build a new HT, the video portion would still cost more.
     
  11. Rob Tomlin

    Rob Tomlin Producer

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2000
    Messages:
    4,505
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Video, without a doubt.
    Many movies, especially older classics, don't have the soundtracks needed to show off a high end audio system. Taking the example to the extreme, the first movies didn't even have sound!
    A pristine image of what is being shown on the screen is important 100% of the time, whereas high quality audio is only needed at certain points in certain movies, such as musicals or action type movies with good sound effects.
    Thank God I don't actually have to make this decision, as I love my audio set-up! [​IMG]
     

Share This Page