What's new

Wiring Multiple Surround Speakers per Channel? (1 Viewer)

Greig

Auditioning
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
4
Does anyone have first hand experience with setting up multi-speaker per channel for Surrounds?
I am setting up 7.1 +Presence in a 13’x 22’room using -
* for SPKR SYSTEM A:
- 3x Jensen EHT-8 130W 6 ohm in walls for front stage
- 2 EHT-6 110w 6 ohm for Presence speakers (to my Yamaha RX-V2600 AVR),
- 2 home made subs, and
- 6 EHT-4 110w x 6 ohm 40 degree- angled drivers in wall or ceiling (not yet sure) for (side) SURROUNDS: THE PROBLEM (see below)
- 2 EHT-4 110w x 6 ohm 40 degree- angled drivers in wall or ceiling (not yet sure) for REAR surrounds.

SYSTEM B: is my old pair of 5spkr x 4way Sansui SP1500 for stereo listening.

Here’s the 7.1 problem area – I have 3 rows of seating so I have been trying to emulate the “multiple side” speakers in commercial theaters so that every row has the correct positioned (side) surrounds (i.e. before I came to know that comm Theatres us 10.2 and have all active (amplified) speakers). So I am trying to place 3 pairs of Surrounds along each side wall at 90 -110 degrees to each row. So do I wire –
•3x PARALLEL, or
•3 x SERIES, or
•2x SERIES + 1 x PARALLEL, or
•2 x PARALLEL + 1 x SERIES, or
•Use an Impedance Compensation device of some sort (and what should/does that present as an impedance value to the surround channels of the AVR?)

See I don’t want to cause EQ issues for the YPAO system, or degrade sound quality, or affect the “relative” volumes of SL and SR compared to the other channels for the listeners in each of the rows.

Thoughts thus far: My first thought was to maintain 6 ohm load/surround-channel to be seen by the AVR so I don’t introduce quality/balance or danger problems to the AVR. To do this I can’t just wire as 3in Para = 2 ohm, 3 in Ser =18ohm, 2 Para + 1 Ser = 9 ohm, and 2 Ser + 1 Para = 9 ohm (Right???). So I’ve hunted for a “black box” only end up buying on recommendation (?) a no-brand one (1pr -> 4 pr) from Radio Shack/Tandy that was supposed to use combinations of series and parallel (?????) to maintain the impedance seen by the AVR at the same value as “the lowest impedance speaker in the array”. BUT it does not do that. I hooked them up and made measurements –
•2 SPEAKERS-
oSwitch 1 +2 = 6 -> 12ohm (obviously just series);
oSwitch 3+4 = same (series);
oeither (1 or 2) + either (3 or 4) =
 

Mattak

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Dec 15, 2003
Messages
247
You can't do a parallel/series combination of 3 without the speakers getting different power levels - eg 2 parallel in series with 1 would give 50% power to the 1 and 50% power split between the parallel 2, so they'd see only 25% power. I think you either need to amp them seperately or put in 4/side. I've never been in a theater that had side surrounds for EVERY row - can't you space them so that all 4 are clumped together along the 3 rows? Amping them seperately would also be a pain with 3 because you're still stuck with 6x6ohm, 2x2/18ohm, or some combination like 2x6ohm + 2x3ohm/2x6ohm + 2x12ohm, none of which makes a great combo for a 4-8ohm amp.
 

Ryan Schnacke

Supporting Actor
Joined
Feb 5, 2001
Messages
876
Do NOT do a combination of series/parallel with 3 speakers. They will not operate evenly. Most of the power will go to either the one speaker or the other two speakers. (Mattak, your post slipped in before me.)

Also do not put all 3 in parallel. Not worth the risk.

I think the best way to go, since you apparently have pre-amp outputs, would be to use 6 channels of identical outboard amplification to drive the surrounds. This way there's no impedence issue and its easy to level-match the 3 pairs of surrounds to each other. Plus it off-loads some of the amplification duty from your receiver so now it only has to spread its power supply capacity across 5 speakers.

One of the cheaper (compromise) solutions would be all 3 in series. There really are efficiency gains for driving an array of speakers such that the volume would be the same IF the 3 speakers were placed close together. Your concerns are valid - you're not planning to place them close together so there is some loss of SPL. But its probably not as much as you might think and you could certainly use the receiver's speaker level settings to boost them to match the other channels. The only question is if your receiver will have enough juice to drive them to your max listening levels.

The other compromise solution would be as you suggested - use the Sansui to power 2 of the 3 pairs of surround speakers. Level matching probably won't be too difficult. But again, you'll have to figure out if this amp has enough juice to meet your listening levels.

In the end it comes down to this - you can easily try both of the compromise solutions and it won't cost you anything but time. Ease up the volume slowly and back it down if any of the signals start to clip. If it works okay then you're done. Otherwise start shopping for more amplification.
 

drobbins

Screenwriter
Joined
Dec 2, 2004
Messages
1,873
Real Name
Dave
Greig,
I am currently running a 6.1 Yamaha HT740 receiver with 9.2 speakers. I have a center above & below the screen and 2 pairs of surrounds for the 2 rows of seating. The doubled up speakers are run in parallel. I haven't had any issues with overheating. The front set is turned more forward and the rear set turned more backward trying to minimize and combing that might happen. I would be willing to bet that if you put one set of surrounds for the front row and another for the third row, you will have good coverage in the second row. Here is the link to my theater
http://www.hometheaterforum.com/gallery1/main.php?g2_view=core.ShowItem&g2_itemId=3369
Dave
 

andySu

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2006
Messages
2,858
There are risks of pulling to much from the amplifier, impendence changes with frequency and heat as well tends to build in the amplifier, due to it’s strain on the loudspeakers impudence.

I have run a series to parallel mode before, and I boy did I get the math wrong on it, buy a friend who’ works in electronics helped me out in that department, which took a matter of minutes.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,052
Messages
5,129,615
Members
144,285
Latest member
acinstallation715
Recent bookmarks
0
Top