Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Archived Threads 2001-2004' started by todd stone, Feb 17, 2003.
On the TV it got two thumbs up from their show, but on the website it shows 2 thumbs down.....
Sounds like an error on the website
heh, that's not gonna be good for business
Ebert's review says three stars. He liked it.
On the show, they both thought it was one of the best comic book movies.
Personally I wanted to see this whether or not critics liked it but it is nice to see that it got good reviews from Ebert and Roeper.
In fact, Ebert is one of the very few top critics to give it a positive review.
this close to being great >
ummm... daredevil has two thumbs up for me; i dont know what YOU guys are lookin at.
Most likely the site has rectified the mistake.
yeah, and someone was FIRED
Personally I think they had it right the first time.
In this week's show, Ebert & Roeper gushed over DareDevil so much -- they even gave it an extended segment -- that I was surprised Roger Ebert only gave it 3 stars, his lowest "thumbs up" rating.
BTW, was anyone else bugged by Ebert's constantly shifting views on CGI effects? Last year, he slammed Spiderman for having some fakey looking CGI-effects in some scenes -- so much so that he gave it a negative review just for this reason. But now he praises the CGI-effects in DareDevil as being more convincing, even though I don't think they don't look any better than the ones in Spiderman.
they fixed it.