Originally Posted by Man-Fai Wong
IMHO, if they want to coherce DVD consumers to go Blu, seems like maybe they should start by giving BD the leg-up on release dates before going whole hog w/ no more DVD-only releases. If the Harry Potter BD combo pack came out a whole month before the DVD-only version (especially if the DVD came out *after* the holiday shopping season), that might've pushed a lot of folks to go Blu w/out as much potential backlash me thinks -- I gotta think they'd get some consumer backlash if they just go whole hog right away.
That's an excellent point. I guess my biggest beef is that there is still a DVD-only release, but no Blu-Ray only release. For those that have already made the switch to Blu, the added value of throwing in the "older" technology is going to be next to nothing for many people.
One can also look at it from the perspective of someone skeptical to Blu-Ray - "Gee, this Blu-Ray thing must really be struggling - why else would they throw one in for free with my DVD."
Granted, it's tougher to entice many people to a new format based solely on the promise of better audio/video quality. DVD was a no-brainer compared to VHS because of the "special features" that really added value to the DVD. With most of the special features a wash between DVD and Blu, and most of the average consumer not concerned with (or knowledgable about) lossless audio and HD video, I can see how it's a hard sell. But IMO, they're going about speeding up adoption the wrong way. A staggered release schedule that favors Blu-Ray would be much more effective, I think.