Oy, what was the problem with that? I've never looked at my copy yet....bryan4999 said:Also, the fourth disc in the last season of MARY TYLER MOORE, they didn't want the disc back, just sent the corrected disc in a white sleeve.
Oy, what was the problem with that? I've never looked at my copy yet....bryan4999 said:Also, the fourth disc in the last season of MARY TYLER MOORE, they didn't want the disc back, just sent the corrected disc in a white sleeve.
Yes, IMDB lists Turner as "uncredited."Matt Hough said:Kathleen Turner has never been credited with voicing Jessica in the original film (she does get credited in the shorts). She must have had some reason for not wanting credit all those years ago.
Right, when the film was released, without a doubt, you recognized who's voice it was.Matt Hough said:She was so famous then that it seems unlikely. Once she starts talking there's no doubt who it is.
The fourth disc of the Mary Tyler Moore Show 7th (last) season final episode had syndication credits at the end, rather than the cast curtain call that was included in the original broadcast. Hopefully, you can still get the replacement disc; it was great to see that again all these years later.Moe Dickstein said:Oy, what was the problem with that? I've never looked at my copy yet....
Mine from Amazon didn't have the slipcover either, but I'm not all that worried about it.Steve Tannehill said:I received my order today from Best Buy. There was no cardboard slipcover (which I seem to recall seeing pictures of) but the DVD was widescreen not full-frame.
I used to keep the long boxes from CD's. Slipcovers are a hard habit to break.Jason_V said:Mine from Amazon didn't have the slipcover either, but I'm not all that worried about it.
I think the whole point of shooting the FX shots in VistaVision (which ILM did on a number of other films) was that the finished shots, once composited, more closely matched the quality of the native 35mm material. If they'd shot everything in the larger format, the jump in quality would have been more noticeable (and it would have been much more expensive, anyway).MatthewA said:As for the transfer, I don't see how it could be improved short of re-scanning and re-combining the effects shots (unlike the past hybrids, they shot some of the effects shots in VistaVision to deal with the generation loss from the opticals; with that in mind, why couldn't they have just shot the whole film in VistaVision?).