mark brown
Supporting Actor
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2005
- Messages
- 567
Why is WAC calling it quits? That is news to me.
Before A T & T sold off Warner to Discovery last month, pretty much everybody at WAC had been fired/ moved around within Warner as of the beginning of April (some blame it on the pandemic, but I wonder if it was coming the moment that plans were made to merge Warner's and Universal's home media departments at the very beginning of 2020). The last we knew (via the last podcast at the beginning of April), there were a number of projects being planned, with releases supposedly going into next year (and maybe even the following one). What we DON'T know is whether WAC will go on (technically, at this point it's more like a brand name as opposed to being an actual division anymore) once those releases are all out. That's what everybody is worried about.Why is WAC calling it quits? That is news to me.
They aren'tWhy is WAC calling it quits? That is news to me.
Why is WAC calling it quits? That is news to me.
Before A T & T sold off Warner to Discovery last month, pretty much everybody at WAC had been fired/ moved around within Warner as of the beginning of April (some blame it on the pandemic, but I wonder if it was coming the moment that plans were made to merge Warner's and Universal's home media departments at the very beginning of 2020). The last we knew (via the last podcast at the beginning of April), there were a number of projects being planned, with releases supposedly going into next year (and maybe even the following one). What we DON'T know is whether WAC will go on (technically, at this point it's more like a brand name as opposed to being an actual division anymore) once those releases are all out. That's what everybody is worried about.
Let's start with what we DO know:They aren't
People are jumping to conclusions with incomplete 'facts' in a changing landscape
3. Warner shut down the Warner Archive storefront at WBShop, and Warner Archive now has a dedicated page at Amazon;
I continue to hope for this release, as well. I’m wondering if there’s some unanticipated legal issue that prevents a home entertainment release. Or perhaps they licensed the title to another distributor- Criterion? Time will tell- fingers crossed!It would be so great if they released Life with Father on bluray as I have already said.
I mean come on. Take Me Out to the Ballgame instead?
And Jimmy Lydon is still alive.
I asked WAC about this one quite a few times when it first premiered on HBO Max. I knew I wouldn’t likely receive a response with the impending company changes and shift from Facebook/Twitter responses. Strange, though, that PD status would prevent this release when WAC released PD titles in the past. If HBO has an exclusive hold on this one, it’s also strange that they continue to readd and pull the film from streaming. The whole situation is a puzzlement.Pretty much.
The studio can try to copyright it but that doesn’t necessarily work. And the burden is still on the studio to prove theft so it can become like a game of whack-a-mole knocking back the pirates.
On the other hand, it’s a 70 or 80 year old movie, not a category that sells particularly well these days. The pirates may not care enough to try to bootleg it.
The delay could very simply be, HBO Max paid for the restoration and want to keep it exclusive to that platform for a
Fun in Acapulco and Blue Hawaii are both owned by Paramount but they would make nice Blu RaysA few that you mentioned already have blurays. Are you not happy with them and believe they should be redone?
It is interesting that they went for Madame Curie before Goodbye Mr Chips and Random Harvest. Poor elements?
I'm surprised Elvis's picture postcard movies like Fun in Acapulco and Blue Hawaii haven't been released in bluray.