Which company do you think MGM should move to if Disney absorbs Fox's home entertainment division?

Which company do you think MGM should move to if Disney absorbs Fox's home entertainment division?

  • Warner Bros.

    Votes: 20 43.5%
  • Sony

    Votes: 3 6.5%
  • Universal

    Votes: 2 4.3%
  • None; they need to stay at Fox.

    Votes: 4 8.7%
  • None; they need to stay at Fox/Disney.

    Votes: 6 13.0%
  • Fox/Disney (for some titles)

    Votes: 1 2.2%
  • Shout/Criterion/Kino/etc.

    Votes: 17 37.0%

  • Total voters
    46
Joined
Jul 25, 2018
Messages
33
Reaction score
11
Points
11
Real Name
F
I wonder if Warner Bros. and Universal might make a joint home entertainment deal with MGM that would see the two split distribution of MGM's content, with Warners distributing MGM's post-April 1986 library, the United Artists, Orion and Cannon libraries, and MGM's television content and select new films, and Universal distributing most if not all of the pre-March 31, 1996 PolyGram library in addition to select new MGM films that they internationally distributed?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Brian Husar
Joined
Jul 25, 2018
Messages
33
Reaction score
11
Points
11
Real Name
F
So, 18 votes so far for Warner Bros., which happens to be the most votes for a potential new distributor. Makes total sense since they already own the real (old) MGM's library and previously distributed MGM(/UA)'s home video and DVD releases in the 1990s so I can see everything MGM being brought back together under one roof. I hope an official announcement of a distribution deal between Warners and MGM happens in a few weeks or sooner, but it'd better not be Universal whom MGM's been relying on the most in recent years to distribute certain of their theatrical releases outside the US (unless Universal wants to join in to split distribution of MGM's content with their new partners at Warners and take on approximately half of that content).
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 25, 2018
Messages
33
Reaction score
11
Points
11
Real Name
F
Looks like there'll be an announcement happening sometime this month. I'm sure MGM is currently holding talks with other studios while looking for a replacement for Fox, trying to see if any studio is interested in distributing their library, some of their newer films, and their TV and digital content on home media. And I think in WB's case as long as they're most interested, they should also sign a non-exclusive trademark licensing agreement to use the MGM logo to promote the pre-1986 MGM library and the MGM legacy since MGM themselves now have licensing partners to grow their logo and are seeking new ones as well; it's one of the most famous logos in the world.

Also, I wish both WB and MGM would work with disc-authorizing facilities to produce new discs of their library content.
 
Last edited:

Jake Lipson

Executive Producer
Premium
Joined
Dec 21, 2002
Messages
10,195
Reaction score
5,327
Points
9,110
Age
31
Real Name
Jake Lipson
Does it really matter which studio puts their titles out? As long as I can get their titles that I want, I'm sure any of the major studios would do a good job on distribution.

The same question was posed when Bond 25 was up for distribution, in terms of which company we wanted to see distribute it. I didn't have a strong opinion then and I don't care now either. For MGM, these types of things are things they need to seriously consider, but for me as a fan, I don't much care which studio does what as long as I can see their content. I'm sorry if this sounds insensitive or naive, but that's what I think. Does it really matter to us which studio's logo gets loaded at the front of the disc? All of the studios are generally doing good work on transfers, etc., so I don't see why it matters to fans where the product comes from.
 
Joined
Jul 25, 2018
Messages
33
Reaction score
11
Points
11
Real Name
F
Does it really matter which studio puts their titles out? As long as I can get their titles that I want, I'm sure any of the major studios would do a good job on distribution.

The same question was posed when Bond 25 was up for distribution, in terms of which company we wanted to see distribute it. I didn't have a strong opinion then and I don't care now either. For MGM, these types of things are things they need to seriously consider, but for me as a fan, I don't much care which studio does what as long as I can see their content. I'm sorry if this sounds insensitive or naive, but that's what I think. Does it really matter to us which studio's logo gets loaded at the front of the disc? All of the studios are generally doing good work on transfers, etc., so I don't see why it matters to fans where the product comes from.
I'm only curious here.
 

Worth

Producer
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
3,575
Reaction score
2,638
Points
4,110
Real Name
Nick Dobbs
I think it's most likely to be Universal, as they already have a deal in place to distribute MGM releases theatrically.
 
Joined
Jul 25, 2018
Messages
33
Reaction score
11
Points
11
Real Name
F
I think it's most likely to be Universal, as they already have a deal in place to distribute MGM releases theatrically.
Actually, that's for select movies only. The other studios distributed most of MGM's other movies since the bankruptcy.
 

Forum Sponsors

Forum statistics

Threads
343,751
Messages
4,688,967
Members
141,027
Latest member
JP2