Randy A Salas
Screenwriter
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2002
- Messages
- 1,348
It's almost becoming too much to even monitor, with Columbia, Warner, Disney etc all releasing P&S rubbish on the market.What are some recent Warner examples?
It's almost becoming too much to even monitor, with Columbia, Warner, Disney etc all releasing P&S rubbish on the market.What are some recent Warner examples?
What are some recent Warner examples?Two blatant examples are "Willy Wonka" and "Cats & Dogs". Warner had no intention of releasing them in widescreen. Thankfully, we didn't just sit around like logs and eventaully got them to release both of them in widescreen.
Too bad that Disney doesn't care what we think apparently.
I almost bought a copy of Edward Scissorhands for $14.99 at Best Buy over the weekend, but guess what? Pan and scan!They must have been out of the widescreen, because I remember getting it the first week it came out and mine's WS.
Two blatant examples are "Willy Wonka" and "Cats & Dogs". Warner had no intention of releasing them in widescreen. Thankfully, we didn't just sit around like logs and eventaully got them to release both of them in widescreen.Well, I think those are the only two examples. The fact that WB did release widescreen versions of those films--even if after fan intervention--would seem to absolve the studio from discussion in this thread about full-screen-only releases. WB has done exactly what Disney, Columbia Tristar and Artisan (why does no one ever mention the full-screen-only dreck from that studio in these threads?) have refused to do: Listen to fans and make things right.
The fact that WB did release widescreen versions of those films--even if after fan intervention--would seem to absolve the studio from discussion in this thread about full-screen-only releases.Perhaps they should still be included since they might not have released them in widescreen if we (and others) didn't raise a peaceful fuss about it. Just because they made restitution doesn't necessarily forgive them for attempting to get away with it in the first place.
I recently was at Wal-Mart... loads and loads of P&S A Beautiful Mind, not a single widescreen copy.
I recently was at Wal-Mart... loads and loads of P&S A Beautiful Mind, not a single widescreen copy.Did you dig in behind the fullscreen releases. I found dual release of ID4 at target and the OARs were in the back. So, you know what I did. Yeup. That's right. Put them in the front.
All stores order equal amounts of both and put equal amounts on the shelf.I wish!
I recently was at Wal-Mart... loads and loads of P&S A Beautiful Mind, not a single widescreen copy.Jeffery beat me to it, but I was going to optimistically suggest that it was because the OAR releases were sold out, also! I don't believe, however, that they order equal amounts...I can't say I've seen equal amounts on release day in a store other than best buy...hmm...could it be that it's because the oar releases ARE selling more? Not from the sales numbers I've seen...joe and jane sixpack still need to be educated...
Why can't they just look at Amazon.comThat's just one retailer--one that tends to cater to more-savvy online consumers and thus not indicative of B&M stores. For example, at Circuit City, the widescreen version of Harry Potter is No. 15 on that retailer's sales chart, while the full-screen version is No. 9. At Best Buy (the nation's largest DVD seller, much bigger than Amazon), HP WS is No. 10, while FS is No. 9. That's according to Video Business' breakdown of retailers on its weekly sales chart. Check that out to see how much sales differ among stores.
http://www.videobusiness.com/dvdsell.asp
Why can't they just look at Amazon.comGreat stats...it's sad but true what Randy said, but when I need a place to point people to help convince them to buy widescreen only, I'll remember amazon! Thanks, Paul!