1. We suffered a brief outage this morning when our host noticed that HTF needed to be moved to a different server due to a hardware failure. That work is now complete. Please post in the feedback area if you have any issues.
    Dismiss Notice

what's this "superbit" thingy?

Discussion in 'Archived Threads 2001-2004' started by Todd Christ, Jan 16, 2002.

  1. Todd Christ

    Todd Christ Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2001
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    0
    so i see some folks talking about [rant]SuperBit DVD's [/rant] - what the heck is that?!?!
     
  2. Sean Conklin

    Sean Conklin Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    1,720
    Likes Received:
    0
    They are a DVD that is produced using higher bitrates than a regular DVD for the Video and audio, they use such a high bitrate there is no room for extra's. The titles offered in Superbit are real limited right now. I haven't seen one so I can't comment on how much better they are.
     
  3. Scott_MacD

    Scott_MacD Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    May 13, 2001
    Messages:
    760
    Likes Received:
    0
    Use the search function.. there's been tons of threads about this in the past.
     
  4. Ronald Epstein

    Ronald Epstein Administrator
    Owner

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 1997
    Messages:
    47,009
    Likes Received:
    4,689
    Real Name:
    Ronald Epstein
    Todd,
    To give you my honest opinion on Superbits....
    These are re-releases of movies already available
    on DVD.
    The idea is that all the extras have been removed
    in order to gain more bandwidth room to present the
    movie at a higher bitrate.
    The truth of the matter, is that this new bitrate
    is not much higher than the bitrate of most movies
    being released to DVD.
    Most people seem to see a slight improvement in
    picture because of the higher bitrate. However,
    take a person off the street who doesn't know any
    better and I doubt they will notice the difference
    between the original pressing and the Superbit
    one.
    The people that seem to notice the most improvement
    are those with high-end equipment.
    Take most any recent release by Fox, Dreamworks,
    Warner and Universal and put them up against a
    Superbit transfer and you'll realize that
    the other studios are putting out just as fantastic
    transfers without claiming they are doing anything
    special with the video bitrate.
    My advice is that if you already own the standard
    version of a title, don't spend the money to upgrade
    to Superbit. You'll lose the extras on the
    disc (deluxe menus and bonus features). If you don't
    already own a particular title, THEN I would recommend
    to purchase the Superbit version.
    I think what Columbia needs to do is to release
    ALL their high-profile titles in SUPERBIT
    initially, and include a secondary disc for the
    supplements.
     
  5. Michael Reuben

    Michael Reuben Studio Mogul

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 1998
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    2
    While I agree with Ron's overall evaluation of superbits, I do think you have to evaluate individual titles on a case-by-case basis. A fair number of the titles being given superbits treatment were initially released by Columbia before dual-layer discs were available. In those days, Columbia rarely included extras, so the superbits version is purely a matter of fitting the movie onto a disc with much greater capacity, with most of the extra bits being alotted to the picture. Examples that I've seen to date are Desperado (which also appears to be a new transfer) and The Fifth Element.

    It's true that you need good equipment, properly adjusted, to fully experience the difference, but it's there. But Ron's point about two-disc editions from studios like Fox is an important one. In that regard, "superbits" is just Columbia's way of creating a name brand for something that other studios are already doing as a matter of course.

    M.
     
  6. Joseph Young

    Joseph Young Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2001
    Messages:
    1,352
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with Ron in that Columbia/TriStar shouldn't use the higher bitrate as a secondary option for high profile titles but rather as the norm. I only own one Superbit title (I chose the visually lush Dracula) and the DTS track is pretty nice. I didn't own the original version, however, so I cannot compare.

    I don't like the packaging, however. It looks 'stale' and 'tacked on.' If Columbia truly wants to market Superbit as a separate product from their 'regular' DVDs, they should be a lot more creative with the way they incorporate the Superbit logo into the packaging (overt but maintaining the theme of the particular release).

    Joseph
     
  7. Butch C

    Butch C Second Unit

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2001
    Messages:
    281
    Likes Received:
    0
    BTW my Costco had a 5 superbit DVD package for $75.

    I know it had at least AF1, Johnny Nmunoic, and Crouching Tiger...oh, the 5th element
     
  8. Sean Conklin

    Sean Conklin Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    1,720
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  9. Bryant Trew

    Bryant Trew Second Unit

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2001
    Messages:
    346
    Likes Received:
    0
    On my 58" Elite:

    1. Dracula has significantly better colour than the original. It actually made me ooh and ahh.

    2. Crouching Tiger is actually watchable now. The original release had tonnes of flaws that are not eliminated, but are significantly reduced.
     

Share This Page