What's the next number...

Discussion in 'After Hours Lounge (Off Topic)' started by Anders Englund, Jul 14, 2003.

  1. Anders Englund

    Anders Englund Second Unit

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 1999
    Messages:
    426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    1 10 11 22 14 45

    Edit: I screwed this one up. The series should read:
    1 10 11 12 14 24
    I leave the orginal to show you how dumb I am. :b

    --Anders
     
  2. Glenn Overholt

    Glenn Overholt Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    Messages:
    4,203
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Is this going to be another one of those trick questions?

    The last one didn't come out so hot.

    Glenn
     
  3. Paul Bond

    Paul Bond Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2000
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My suppostition is below, but I have to really stretch my theory to make it work going from 1 to 10.


    59
     
  4. Alex Spindler

    Alex Spindler Producer

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2000
    Messages:
    3,971
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    29?
     
  5. Anders Englund

    Anders Englund Second Unit

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 1999
    Messages:
    426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sorry, Paul. You got one digit right. [​IMG]

    Oh, and you might wanna think of the first number as "01".

    --Anders
     
  6. Kevin_Spradley

    Kevin_Spradley Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2000
    Messages:
    171
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm with Paul on this one. It is a stretch to go from 1 to 10,

    but my answer is the same as paul's

    59
     
  7. Anders Englund

    Anders Englund Second Unit

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 1999
    Messages:
    426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And Alex is the winner!!!! [​IMG]

    --Anders
     
  8. Ron Pinsonneault

    Ron Pinsonneault Auditioning

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 1999
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    70
     
  9. MarkHastings

    MarkHastings Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2003
    Messages:
    12,013
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    834,688,365.43??? [​IMG]

    Everyone sing along:
    Infinity bottles of beer on the wall...Infinity bottles of beer,
    You take one down, pass it around, Infinity bottles of beer on the wall...

    Infinity bottles of beer on the wall...Infinity bottles of beer,
    You take one down, pass it around, Infinity bottles of beer on the wall...

    Infinity bottles of beer on the wall...Infinity bottles of beer,
    You take one down, pass it around, Infinity bottles of beer on the wall...

    Infinity bottles of beer on the wall...Infinity bottles of beer,
    You take one down, pass it around, Infinity bottles of beer on the wall...

    etc.
     
  10. Alex Spindler

    Alex Spindler Producer

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2000
    Messages:
    3,971
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm in trouble. If I am indeed right, my method to get there may be flawed. My case for my answer is not able to support either the 1 or the 1 to 11 bracket.

    The second digit was derived by the sum of the digits in the number that preceded it. Example, the 5 in 45 was the sum of the 1 and 4 in 14. This doesn't work for the 1, as the number that follows is a 10.

    The first digit I got by subtracting the two preceding digits and adding a 1. So, the 2 in 29 was based on subtracting 4 from 5 and adding 1. The 4 in 45 was based on the difference from 4 and 1 and adding 1. This doesn't work on the lower numbers.

    So, I got the right answer by a flawed method. So shoot me.
     
  11. Anders Englund

    Anders Englund Second Unit

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 1999
    Messages:
    426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sorry, Alex that was the wrong method.

    The first digit is derived from the median value (rounded) of all preceding SECOND digits. In this case (1+0+1+2+4+5)/6 = 13/6 = >2.
    The second digit is the sum of all preceding first digits. 0+1+1+2+1+4 = 9.

    Maybe this was too far fetched. A friend of mine managed to solve it... In two days.

    --Anders
     
  12. Kevin_Spradley

    Kevin_Spradley Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2000
    Messages:
    171
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Isn't that calculation actually the mean value? The median is the middle number in a set.
     
  13. Alex Spindler

    Alex Spindler Producer

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2000
    Messages:
    3,971
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Anders, I don't think that method would work either01
    10 = [1/1=1]_________________ [0=0]
    11 = [(1+0)/2=0.5=1]_________ [0+1=1]
    22 = [(1+0+1)/3=0.66=1]______ [0+1+1=2]
    14 = [(1+0+1+2)/4=1]_________ [0+1+1+2=4]
    45 = [(1+0+1+2+4)/5=1.6=2]___ [0+1+1+2+1=5]
    29 = [(1+0+1+2+4+5)/6=2.16=2] [0+1+1+2+1+4=9]

    So, the first digit method doesn't work for either 22 or 45.
     
  14. Anders Englund

    Anders Englund Second Unit

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 1999
    Messages:
    426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
     

Share This Page