Chris Maynard
Supporting Actor
- Joined
- Nov 7, 1998
- Messages
- 667
Pretty soon Ford will begin selling tanks. Road Warrior, indeed..
Any word on the specs? Sounds interesting. I could use one of those.
Pretty soon Ford will begin selling tanks. Road Warrior, indeed..
Any word on the specs? Sounds interesting. I could use one of those.
It is my understanding that light trucks are exempt from CAFE and SUVs are classified as light trucks
Sorry about the confusion. I was just stating that light trucks are [rant]not[/rant] exempt from CAFE, this is just not true. But yes, you are correct that SUVs are classified as light trucks.
Joseph
You'll nerver catch me driving anything but an SUV or a Truck. They are just so much more fun to drive than a car.
You must have been driving the wrong cars.
Or maybe I drove the wrong SUV's.
/Mike
You'll nerver catch me driving anything but an SUV or a Truck. They are just so much more fun to drive than a car.
More fun? Really? How so? (I'm not being combative here, just seriously curious).
I can think of a few things that are fun in a 4x4, but driving on the road isn't one of them.
This is precisely why I can never move to Texas, or return to my home state of WV- I can't see the point of trucks as daily transportation, and I don't own any guns.
Todd
You'll nerver catch me driving anything but an SUV or a Truck. They are just so much more fun to drive than a car.
Ron, please elaborate! What do you find fun about trucks/SUVs? To me they are the least fun vehicles to drive due to their size, weight and high center of gravity.
I can't imagine how a truck or a SUV would be more fun to drive than my WRX, so presumably we have different definitions of driving "fun".
SUVs arent popular with the J6P crowd anywhere but in the USA and mexico and canada. Which sorta makes you think "what does the rest of the world know that we dont"??? That way american companies make a MEGA profit on very cheap to build vehicles since they couldnt remain competitive with small and average size cars as the rest of the world was.
Well any company is free to make SUV's and bring them to the US, hell a Honda Accord is more domestic than a few Fords (which are built in Canada or Mexico). BMW did it with the X5, built in the USA, sure some of them are imported out of the country but it's a US vehicle for the most part.
As to why US drivers have more SUV's than the rest of the world, check out how small roads are in the rest of the world, parking spaces are a fun one as well. Fuel economy becomes a big issue as well. I drove a mid-size car in Europe a few months ago and it was ridiculous, it felt like I was driving a bus every time I wanted to park the thing, and never mind the wheezy 2.0l engine drank about $80US of gas for a fill-up (and this from an economical mid-size car, was very similiar in some ways to the older Altima's). I couldn't imagine taking over our Nissan Pathfinder and driving it around, or even my Mustang...both of which would require a couple of EMT's with a heart jump starter every time I went to fill up the gas tank.
Andrew
I just bet you high performance will come to environmentally friendly vehicles.
See, in my mind, efficiency=high performance. Virtually every car on the road today shows this to be true, when comparing them to their counterparts 10-15 years ago.
Consider:
1986 Acura Legend- 2.5L V6, 170hp, 26 or so mpg highway
2002 Acura TL-S- 3.2L V6, 260hp, 30mpg highway
1992 Chevy Z28- 5.7L 350, 230hp, 24mpg highway
2002 Chevy Z28- 5.7L 350, 320hp, 28mpg highway
Two examples off the top of my head. Huge increases in power, and still gains in fuel economy. There are bigger gains to be had. In fact, this is almost a good time to start trading a bit of power for a bit more fuel economy. The car manufacturers ought to take the high road on this, and pick up the pace. Otherwise, the government might mandate it before the manufacturers have perfected the technology. Like the emissions issues from 1970-1972, when HP dropped about 30-40% across the board in those three model years.
In any internal combustion engine, a substantial portion of the energy (generated from burning the gas) is completely wasted (over half, if I recall), through the radiator. What can be done to reduce those losses, those great sinks of efficiency? I suppose if I knew, I'd be rich.
Todd
You'll nerver catch me driving anything but an SUV or a Truck. They are just so much more fun to drive than a car.
I had a 1996 Jeep Cherokee Sport. I LOVED that truck. I spent MANY MANY hours off-roading. I never got stuck, and my Jeep just begged for more!
However, as far as calling it fun to drive... well, let's say the only thing I liked about it's on-road driving capabilities was the view of the road ahead. It really does give you an advantage being able to see what's happening - those extra seconds can save you from an accident. But personally, I would never call it fun to drive. It handled poorly, had terrible brakes, and didn't track straight on the highway above 65 MPH.
I gave my Jeep to my sister in 2000 (she still has it with 130,000 miles still running like a champ!) and bought a 2000 Honda Prelude 5 speed. Now THIS is FUN driving!! This car handles like a dream, has powerful brakes, steering and handling that rivals BMWs, and is just plain FUN to drive. Not to mention it's mean snarl when you rev it past 5500RPM's. Very fun engine for a "4-banger"
Now if my car insurance wasn't $2700/year!!! (and this is with a perfect record, no points, accidents, etc.......) But that's off-topic...
Matt
SUVs arent popular with the J6P crowd anywhere but in the USA and mexico and canada. Which sorta makes you think "what does the rest of the world know that we dont"???
From what I observed 99% of SUV purchases are made due to skewed personal values and priorities,... I don't even talk to anyone with an SUV! Just kidding.