Adam Lenhardt
Senior HTF Member
Apollo 13
Originally Released: 06/30/1995
Watched: 08/02/2020
4K UHD digital streaming on Apple TV app via Roku Ultra
In recognition of America's first successful water landing since 1975, returning astronauts Douglas Hurley and Robert Behnken safely to Earth at the conclusion of the first crewed orbital spaceflight launched from the United States since the end of the space shuttle program, I was moved to revisit arguably the best feature film yet made about America's space program.
Apollo 13 won the Oscar for Best Film Editing, and deserved to. At two hours, twenty minutes it feels exactly the right length. It is a marvel of editing, juggling a number of different narratives simultaneously and visiting each one exactly when we need to in order to place it in the context of the larger whole. Every shot is exactly the right length, every piece of information conveyed clearly and at exactly the same time.
Both this film and The Martian are great movies about triumph through problem solving. But where this movie rises above, setting aside the added difficulty of telling a true story, is in its depiction of problem solving as teamwork. Matt Damon spends a lot of The Martian on his own, a celebration of individual resolve and ingenuity. But when Apollo 13 suffers a catastrophic failure three days into its mission, this film understands that it took the work of hundreds, if not thousands, to bring those three men home safely.
Narrative storytelling relies on well-defined characters, so stories built around a large number of people making small contributions run counter to screenwriters' natural instincts.
What the screenplay by William Broyles Jr. and Al Reinert does so well is give us less than a dozen characters we're really invested in as people and then trusts that the audience will care about all of the other characters shown in the context of what they contribute to the larger goal. The audience isn't necessarily invested in Loren Dean as the movie's facsimile of EECOM John Aaron, for instance, but the audience is definitely invested in whether EECOM and Ken Mattingly can figure out a way to get Apollo 13 enough power to carry them to splashdown.
The movie identifies one problem after another, and then concisely and efficiently portrays how NASA solved each problem. There is no real artificial drama in the movie, because the filmmakers know and trust that there is enough drama baked into the premise.
By the time Jim Lovell, Fred Haise, and Jack Swigert make it to the USS Iwo Jima, the audience feels like it's been through this ordeal with them.
Originally Released: 06/30/1995
Watched: 08/02/2020
4K UHD digital streaming on Apple TV app via Roku Ultra
In recognition of America's first successful water landing since 1975, returning astronauts Douglas Hurley and Robert Behnken safely to Earth at the conclusion of the first crewed orbital spaceflight launched from the United States since the end of the space shuttle program, I was moved to revisit arguably the best feature film yet made about America's space program.
Apollo 13 won the Oscar for Best Film Editing, and deserved to. At two hours, twenty minutes it feels exactly the right length. It is a marvel of editing, juggling a number of different narratives simultaneously and visiting each one exactly when we need to in order to place it in the context of the larger whole. Every shot is exactly the right length, every piece of information conveyed clearly and at exactly the same time.
Both this film and The Martian are great movies about triumph through problem solving. But where this movie rises above, setting aside the added difficulty of telling a true story, is in its depiction of problem solving as teamwork. Matt Damon spends a lot of The Martian on his own, a celebration of individual resolve and ingenuity. But when Apollo 13 suffers a catastrophic failure three days into its mission, this film understands that it took the work of hundreds, if not thousands, to bring those three men home safely.
Narrative storytelling relies on well-defined characters, so stories built around a large number of people making small contributions run counter to screenwriters' natural instincts.
What the screenplay by William Broyles Jr. and Al Reinert does so well is give us less than a dozen characters we're really invested in as people and then trusts that the audience will care about all of the other characters shown in the context of what they contribute to the larger goal. The audience isn't necessarily invested in Loren Dean as the movie's facsimile of EECOM John Aaron, for instance, but the audience is definitely invested in whether EECOM and Ken Mattingly can figure out a way to get Apollo 13 enough power to carry them to splashdown.
The movie identifies one problem after another, and then concisely and efficiently portrays how NASA solved each problem. There is no real artificial drama in the movie, because the filmmakers know and trust that there is enough drama baked into the premise.
By the time Jim Lovell, Fred Haise, and Jack Swigert make it to the USS Iwo Jima, the audience feels like it's been through this ordeal with them.