Well, you're talking about flash memory players with those memory requirements. That rules out most of the overall portable mp3 market since most use hard drive (e.g., iPod, Sony, etc.).
Flash memory players are generally much more expensive than their hard drive counterparts and are worse overall values. But they have their advantages, such as small size, portability, and ruggedness. So if you're looking for something to use while working out, flash memory might be the way to go.
I own an iPod myself. Sorry I couldn't be more specific....
How is the SQ on the iPods? I bought my sis an iRiver CD player last Xmas that also decoded mp3s but it sounded so weak and tinny compared to my aging Sony Discman.
Just wondering if Apple takes into consideration people may use $100+ headphones instead of the ones they include. And before anyone asks I used to have a META42 based portable amp that didn't sound that much different when connected to the Discman. :frowning:
According to Stereophile magazine, iPod's sound quality is audiophile quality, particularly when encoded at higher bitrate. Since the review, Apple has released Apple Loseless Encoding option for iPod as well.
The ratio of cost to storage is way better than much else out there... 120 songs at 192+ KBps per CD.
A bit bulkier, but the amount of music available is just awesome for the price.
I have one i bought 3 years ago that doesnt even have ID3 tag support, and i still use it often, when my MP3 player runs out of music (got it from my friend, CAD$80 for 128MB player and CA$45 for 256MB SD card). Cant beat having many hours of CD in a single CD case.
But seeing the price of flash memory (saw 1GB SD card for ~$60 USD, insane!), might wanna just get a flash player and invest in a big flash card.
I used to agree, but now that you can get 15 gigs for under 150 bucks, 20 gigs for about 175 I've thrown mine away, no more cd's to carry around, they all fit on the DJ and I have 8 gigs of free space.
Unless you're looking for something that can take a whole lot of shock, a HD based player is a much better value than a flash one. Besides, having 40 Gb of music on hand is really handy. You never have to think about what mp3s to bring, since you have ALL of them with you all the time!
I've been really happy with my Creative Nomad Jukebox 3, but I believe that Creative has discontinued this model. The Zen players are similar (and smaller), but have fewer buttons and are missing the line outputs that the NJB3 has. Sound quality is really good on both the noise cancelling headphones (though they're not $100 headphone quality), and on the line out to my amp. I've also found that the creative players have a better feature set than the ipods, and also come in cheaper, so definitely worth looking at.
Which of these has a FM tuner? I know you may say you don't need that with the gazillion meg of space but I do cardio first thing in the morning at the gym and like to watch the news via the wireless transmitter to FM. After that I want my kick it in high gear music..
Don't want to hijack this thread, but at the same time, don't want to start another "which mp3 player" thread. So just wondering if anyone can provide some advice for me. Here are my requirements:
HD based, 15+ GB No silly sync software, I just want to be able to plug it in and drag-n-drop files to it, ideally it would work without drivers Be able to store any kind of file Don't need any more support than MP3 (don't care about WMA, OGG, or AAC)
Past that, the features I would be most interested in would be:
Good battery life (does the kind of battery matter? can anyone explain the difference between Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Polymer?) Easy use in my car (via FM transmitter, tape deck, whatever)
As far as I can tell, the iRiver H120 is my best option. Are there any others out there that suit my needs?
This does not refer to the speed of the download, but to the bitrate of the music file. A higher bitrate music file takes up more space (thus fewer songs on your player), but you get higher quality. A lower bitrate music file takes up less space (thus more songs on your player), but you lose quality. It's personal preference really. How much quality are you willing to sacrifice to get more songs on your player?
Now I've got a question of my own to throw out to any iPod owners out there. Anyone use XPlay, EphPod, or Anapod? I'm not a fan of the iTunes so looking at alternatives if I deicde to go with the iPod.
So if the bit rate is 128 verses 64 should I expect half the amount of songs? What does a typical c.d. run at? Is there a conversion of memory space to bit rate?Also what's the biggest diffrence between Flash, SD and MMC? Sorry so many questions. The wife is getting me one and I want to be sure of what I want.
Id like to suggest the new Sony mini-disc walkmans. (fairly small) they just released some that doubled the capacity of the mini-discs. which is nice. I use it at the gym. one day I want to listen to all things tupac, the next I want nothign but Tool or GNR. all I have to do is switch mini-discs. But I must admit, the Dell thing sounds interesting. how big are those?