What's new

What happened to private eye shows? (1 Viewer)

Chris Lockwood

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 21, 1999
Messages
3,215
Back in the 70s there were a lot of private detective shows, like Mannix, Cannon, Barnaby Jones, Rockford Files.

Now, all the crime shows seem to be about police or other gov't agents, such as CSI or Law & Order.

Another difference is that the PI shows were mostly focused on one lead character, while the cop shows tend to be more ensembles where the entire cast can be changed over time.

The closest thing currently to a PI show I can think of is Burn Notice, and even that guy is an ex-gov't agent.

What happened to the PI genre?
 

Joseph Bolus

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 4, 1999
Messages
2,779
It could just be that Magnum, P.I. killed them all off.
I mean here's a self-deprecating former Naval Officer (and Vietnam War Vet) running around Hawaii solving crimes with the help of his former war veterans.

The format of the show was so "wide open" that you could do serious drama one week, a complete spoof of the genre' the next, and broad comedy the week after that. And all of this with the gorgeous Hawaii scenery in the background. I mean, where do you go from there?

Fortunately, all eight seasons are available on DVD!
 

Michael Reuben

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 12, 1998
Messages
21,763
Real Name
Michael Reuben
I don't follow it, but wouldn't Monk qualify?

The most recent entries in the genre had trouble finding audiences and were canceled. Those were Moonlight (1 season) and Veronica Mars (3 seasons). I realize that neither one featured a classic P.I., but they both followed the genre.

I suppose we could also include Pushing Daisies, which does feature (a) a P.I. character, and (b) a murder to be solved in each episode.

M.
 

Brian^K

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
681
Real Name
Brian
Monk definitely qualifies. Also, Psych is a PI comedy-drama, with an ensemble cast (2+3+1).

I think The Eleventh Hour will also qualify, at least partially. And Medium also, again, partially.
 

JeremyErwin

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2001
Messages
3,218
I've noticed that many of the cop shows tend to treat Private Investigators as dilettantes, failed cops, and obstructionists. Homicide and NCIS for instance.
Patricia Cornwell has been quoted as saying she doesn't write "mysteries", she writes "crime novels." Personally, I think Cornwall's a hack, but I still enjoy Reginald Hill's "Dalziel and Pascoe" police procedurals more than most "detective stories"-- and those are fast becoming ensemble stories...
 

Ethan Riley

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2005
Messages
4,276
Real Name
Ethan Riley
Well, first off--see another thread in this forum about Hawaii 5-0 and Streets of San Francisco making a possible comeback.

Anyway, I think it's high time these shows got back to being about the detectives, rather than the crimes. Monk is great; CSI has become a crashing bore.
 

Zack Gibbs

Screenwriter
Joined
Sep 15, 2005
Messages
1,687
Four of USA's originals meet the format really, and they're all pretty good. But not so good that they're above doing crossovers. Where are the crossovers dammit!?
htf_images_smilies_smile.gif
 

Chris Lockwood

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 21, 1999
Messages
3,215
> Well, first off--see another thread in this forum about Hawaii 5-0 and Streets of San Francisco making a possible comeback.

Aren't those both cop shows?

I've never seen Monk, but imdb describes him as a cop on leave.
 

Jason Seaver

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 30, 1997
Messages
9,303
He's a "consulting detective", like Sherlock Holmes. He hopes to rejoin the force one day, but lost his badge when his OCD went out of control after his wife's death.

As to the original question, a few of real-world developments may provide some explanation:

(1) High divorce rates. This is kind of out-there, but bear with me. 20+ years ago, the only encounters most people had with PIs were the fictional kind, and even if Sam Spade or Philip Marlowe acknowledged their seediness, they had a heart of gold underneath. Now, a great many more people have either been through a nasty divorce or know someone who has, and that tends to get one looking at PIs not as fallen knights-errant, but the troll who does the work that even a scuzzy divorce lawyer doesn't want to dirty his hands with. Good luck making that guy a hero.

(2) Reduction of "missing persons" cases. It's much harder to go missing than it used to be because of all the records everybody keeps and identification they require, and the FBI has done a pretty good job of destroying kidnapping for ransom as a viable crime in the US. Stories that would once be a good fit for Magnum, P.I. are now on Without a Trace. And that doesn't even take into account...

(3) The Internet. Aside from making it hard to disappear, it can suck the excitement out of what stories are left. Rob Thomas mentioned during interviews for Veronica Mars that half of their cases would, in real life, be solved by Keith spending an hour or so on the computer searching publicly available websites and the various networks available to licensed private investigators. That's not exciting television.


So, basically, you've got characters less likely to be found sympathetic and stories that would be more difficult to tell with the verisimilitude today's audiences expect from their procedural shows.
 

Holadem

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2000
Messages
8,967
Maybe but did you ever feel like that watching the show? Why couldn't other series skirt the issue just like Veronica Mars did? A series like L&O:CI would require minimal changes to turn into a PI show, and it suffers none of the pitfalls you attribute to times.

--
H
 

Sylvia*ST

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Feb 17, 2005
Messages
92
I think it is useful to remember the early PI shows were, in the words of 77 Sunset Strip creator Roy Huggins, "westerns with guys in convertibles instead of on horses." I think 50 years of PI shows is a good run. I'd still love to see a new spin on the genre, though.
 

JeremyErwin

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2001
Messages
3,218
Now, I'm not really a fan of westerns, but that's beside the point. Here, the author is merely reflecting on a certain staleness and unoriginality. Describing a genre as "just like a western, but..." is an open invitation to laziness on the part of the writers

After all, good Westerns aren't "just like Westerns, but..." There's something more.

Anyway, I'd have to go with Jason's analysis. The audience has to identify with the detective as someone other than "the guy who digs up the dirt on your sister's lying spouse." In the classic detective stories, cops were dim, bumbling, indiscrete, and definitely lower class. The detective was often intelligent, discrete enough, and often upper class-- Campion, Lord Perter Whimsey, Hercule Poirot.

Granted, the American detective is slightly different, but in most of the stories the local police don't have the resources-- be it brains, political independence, or guts. Now, the popular perception of law enforcement is somewhat different.
If the viewer must ask himself "why didn't she just go to the police," the story is harder to write... (Please don't say "Because the police are too close minded to talk to spirits.")
 

Dave B Ferris

Screenwriter
Joined
Apr 27, 2000
Messages
1,259
As Jason mentioned, I think real-world developments have intruded. After 9/11, especially, the idea of a single PI solving problems may seem simplistic and outdated.

Many people now believe in conspiracy theories involving multi-national organizations and governments, which is why, I think (as the OP mentioned) the single PI has now mostly been replaced by shows with government agents or other characters who are involved with unraveling conspiracies.
 

Jason Seaver

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 30, 1997
Messages
9,303
I think more people have been exposed to helpful lawyers, and I believe that most of the lawyer shows on today are either focused on prosecutors and public defenders or embrace a certain amount of the amorality (what's left, other than Boston Legal?). You don't see Matlock or Perry Mason these days.

Anyway, I think the larger point is that the perception of what PIs do has changed over time, both because certain romantic misconceptions have fallen away and because the job itself has changed.

Plus, audiences didn't watch Veronica Mars, Andy Barker, and Eyes, and you can't blame studios for not throwing good money after bad.
 

Wvtvguy

Second Unit
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
311
Real Name
Marc
I just saw this thread. I've been alternating between watching MANNIX & THE ROCKFORDl FILES. Really enjoying both shows. Lone characters simply don't exist on tv today. With social media, people are constantly connected to someone. I think the idea of the loner is much less appealing. All characters today have some sort of support team. A single character with a constantly changing cast of characters is probably less appealing than the ensemble casts we have today.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
356,582
Messages
5,116,610
Members
144,119
Latest member
Lockheede
Recent bookmarks
0
Top