What can I use to measure the frequency in my room?

Discussion in 'Beginners, General Questions' started by DanielKellmii, Mar 11, 2004.

1. DanielKellmii Supporting Actor

Joined:
Feb 5, 2004
Messages:
524
0
Trophy Points:
0
I am interested in measuring the frequencies that I actually hear in my room. Other than lugging my computer in there and buy a decent microphone, what can I use?

2. Wayne A. Pflughaupt Producer

Joined:
Aug 5, 1999
Messages:
6,130
40
Trophy Points:
6,610
Location:
Katy, TX
Real Name:
Wayne
An cheap and easy (but time consuming) way is to use a test disc with 1/6-octave sine wave signals, an SPL meter and some graph paper. You take SPL measurements of the individual tones and plot them on the graph paper for a visual of your response.

Regards,
Wayne A. Pflughaupt

3. ChrisWiggles Producer

Joined:
Aug 19, 2002
Messages:
4,791
1
Trophy Points:
0
An SPL meter.

4. DanielKellmii Supporting Actor

Joined:
Feb 5, 2004
Messages:
524
0
Trophy Points:
0
Chris, a SPL meter just measures the sound pressure, that is the amplitude, What I am looking for is the frequency.
Think of a sine wave or just a line that rises and lowers to the same point as time goes on. The SPL meter measures how high the line goes. Frequency is how many peaks and valleys are squeezed in a given length. The more peaks and valleys, the higher the frequency (a flute), the fewer, the lower the frequency (a bass). A picture would be so helpful here, but I have no server to host it on.
Waynes suggestion is great, but I need to get a test disk and some time to do this. I don't think I will ever have the time for that.

5. ChrisWiggles Producer

Joined:
Aug 19, 2002
Messages:
4,791
1
Trophy Points:
0
I know. You use sine tones and an SPL meter, and graph it. That's the hard, but cheap way without spectral analyzing equipment or computer stuff.

6. Wayne A. Pflughaupt Producer

Joined:
Aug 5, 1999
Messages:
6,130
40
Trophy Points:
6,610
Location:
Katy, TX
Real Name:
Wayne
I can’t see it taking more than 30 minutes or so to accomplish – maybe 45 tops.

Regards,
Wayne A. Pflughaupt

7. Oachalon Stunt Coordinator

Joined:
Apr 23, 2002
Messages:
195
0
Trophy Points:
0
sorry to jump in on this thread but lets say i had a computer and a decent microphone in my room how can i find the frequency response of my room. What program do i use and how do i set it up. Would u count the microphone that came with the yamaha 1400 as a decent microphone. Thanks

8. DanielKellmii Supporting Actor

Joined:
Feb 5, 2004
Messages:
524
0
Trophy Points:
0
Wayne, that is almost a possibility. Does the AVIA disk have those kinds of tones? If not, where can I get them? Maybe I can generate them myself and record them on a CD on my computer.

Now all I have to do is convince my wife to take the kids out shopping while I "play." To her, if I am not cleaning the house, I am playing. Cutting the grass...playing..Fixing the car....playing..Pressure washing the driveway.... playing....

9. Nathan Stohler Second Unit

Joined:
Jan 17, 2004
Messages:
329
0
Trophy Points:
0
Daniel,

Do a web search for NCH Tone Generator. I used that to create test tones, and then I burned them to a CD.

10. WayneO Supporting Actor

Joined:
Nov 10, 2003
Messages:
625
0
Trophy Points:
0
If you have broadband I can email you 2 3MB files that have 10-100hz 1/12 octave tones and has an excel chart as well that you can enter values and will apply the correction factors for the RS meter and graph it for you. PM me your email if you'd like them.

11. Bill Waxman Auditioning

Joined:
Apr 23, 2004
Messages:
11
0
Trophy Points:
0
I downloaded the NCH tone generator, but I am unsure of which tones I should burn and at what levels. I'm also not sure where various octave levels are or what levels they would equate to. Also, are these signals being created by a mono or stereo output in the program?

I guess, basically, that if anyone has a step-by-step resource for creating a test cd and how to use one, I would greatly appreciate a link or the help. I thank you very much in advance for the information.

-Bill

12. Steve::Weaver Agent

Joined:
Jan 27, 2004
Messages:
34
0
Trophy Points:
0
That's a good thinking, Bill. Why figure out something yourself when you can have someone do it for you?

All kidding aside, as an engineer (not audio) turned management-type, it doesn't make sense for me to spend a couple of hours figuring things out on my own if someone has already done it and can be persuaded to share what they already know along these lines.

I know it'd take a few minutes (at least) to put this down on paper (or in bits) but if someone already had a procedure and test tones handy, it'd make a great addition to the FAQ. (I'll admit that I didn't look for this in the FAQ just now, but I don't recall seeing it in there when I read completely through it a couple of months ago.)

Q: How to I determine the frequency response response of my sub/speakers/'72 Ford Pinto?

A: First, you'll need an SPL meter (Radio Shack catalog #33-4050), and a set of test tones, which you should download from...

13. Bill Waxman Auditioning

Joined:
Apr 23, 2004
Messages:
11
0
Trophy Points:
0
Steve,

I use the FAQ and Glossary quite often (still relatively new), and you are correct that there is nothing there yet (that I could find). Frankly, reinventing the wheel has never appealed to me, but I do agree that it is best to learn things on one's own. I've read that calibrating one's system can improve it's sound. My thoughts were that, as a novice, if some one had a proven method, it would be most likely be far more reliable than anything I could piece together.

In my research, the only test tone suggestions I've found are for calibrating sub woofers. It was suggested that one measure the sound levels from 16-120hz by factors of 8 and then try to correct the various levels. However, this fails to explain higher frequencies as there would be 2,485 levels to test between 120hz and 20khz for calibrating the speakers.

I appologize if I offended your belief that knowledge should be earned. I generally agree with this philosphy when others are simply being lazy. But I can assure you that this is not the case. I have learned a great deal since finding this forum, but I fear that my knowledge is not yet where I wish it to be. Perhaps I will eventually find enough information on test tones to add a page to the FAQ! (Probably dreamin' on that one though, eh?)

So, if anyone does have some sort of step-by-step guide, or is willing to create one, I'm sure that many people, perhaps Steve as well, would be greatful for it. Otherwise, stay tuned for mine...

As always, thank you in advance.
-Bill

14. Steve::Weaver Agent

Joined:
Jan 27, 2004
Messages:
34
0
Trophy Points:
0
Bill, I think you may have mistaken my joking first sentence as me being serious, but I definitely was not.

In fact, I have a hard time being serious even when I try to be (please note the the above Ford Pinto comment).

As for actual measurements, it seems to me (and I'm a self-certified audio moron!) that you'd want to measure logarithmically. That is, you take the same number of measurements between 10 Hz and 100 Hz as you do between 100 Hz and 1 kHz, and between 1kHz and 10 kHz. What resolution you choose for this scale would depend on how precise you wanted to be, but you could certainly get a decent response graph with no more than a couple hundred measurements.

Ideally, this would be done with a high-quality microphone and a computer, playing test tones and recording the actual room response, but it could certainly be done by hand with a little patience.

Surely several people on this forum have done exactly that and could shed some light on their methodology. We just have to wait for them to come out of the woodwork...

Joined:
Jun 29, 2001
Messages:
7,270
1
Trophy Points:
0
If your intention is to somehow use the SPL meter, whether it be the RS or one costing thousands, and burn test tones, covering a range of frequencies from say 20 Hz to 20 kHz in whatever increments, in order to somehow map your room, then don't. Simply because you obtain data and can plot it does not mean that it will be either accurate or useful. Further, even though thousands may have done it does not give the approach any more credibility.

Using such an approach will ensure that you have data with enormous response variations. They will be dependent upon..
• how the meter is pointed
• where its held in relationship to where you are
This is due to a couple of reasons. In the lower freqency area, much of the data is a result of room effects. In the upper frequencies there will be quite substantial variations as a result of interferences. Moving the microphone of the SPL just a bit will give you an entirely different set of results.

SPL meters were never intended to do such measurements as they are broadband devices to be used for giving a single number for the total SPL. You could though obtain something like 1/3 octave pink noise bands in which case you wouldn't see the anomalous results mentioned above inherent in sine wave mapping. Nonetheless, obtaining bad data can lead you to make bad decisions especially if you try and make some sort of corrections such as equalization in order to flatten out a room's FR.

If your intent is to obtain data that can be used to help you in some way this is not the approach.

16. Cagri Second Unit

Joined:
Dec 18, 2002
Messages:
415
0
Trophy Points:
110
If the data is dependant upon where the meter is pointed and where it's held in relationship to the listener, isn't it still broadly accurate? I mean few of us listen to music without moving our head, in the form of a statue... Or there may be a moving body in the room every now and then...

What would be the better approach Chu?

17. ScottCHI Screenwriter

Joined:
Feb 21, 2004
Messages:
1,292
1
Trophy Points:
0
he said: "You could though obtain something like 1/3 octave pink noise bands in which case you wouldn't see the anomalous results mentioned above inherent in sine wave mapping."

if you want to see what he's talking about, set your meter up and do the sine wave measurements. then move the meter a foot forward and a foot to the left or right and repeat the measurements. unless you've gone to great lengths to reduce the room's effects, you should see quite a bit of variation, due to the room, from frequency to frequency.

18. Cagri Second Unit

Joined:
Dec 18, 2002
Messages:
415
0
Trophy Points:
110

which makes me think he's suggesting a different way..

19. Bob McElfresh Producer

Joined:
May 22, 1999
Messages:
5,182
0
Trophy Points:
0

Joined:
Jun 29, 2001
Messages:
7,270