Seth_L
Screenwriter
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2002
- Messages
- 1,553
Does anyone have any opinions on Wharfedale Speakers? I recently bought a few different pairs off Ubid and I've been very impressed with what I've heard so far. I'd be interested in seeing what other people think of them.
My mains before all this were Infinity Interlude IL40 towers. I really liked them. Still do.
I bought a pair of Wharfedale Modus 1.6 towers and a pair of Wharfedale Emerald 99 towers. These are the top of the line towers from the respective lines of Wharfedale.
Here's how they sort out.
Infinity IL40:
Perhaps a little over emphasized in the midrange. Lacks the low end bass of the Emerald 99 and the Modus 1.6. When played above reference volume they become somewhat harsh in the mid and high end. They do not seem to distort even with very high levels of bass. These are rear ported and as a result are somewhat sensative to corner loading.
Emerald 99:
The midrange is bit laid back on this speaker. It has a fair bit more low end extension than the Infinity. It has a less dominant low end than the Modus 1.6. It bass is also a little "tighter" and more controlled at loud volumes. These speakers do not get harsh when cranked. They really sing at loud volume (above reference). These are front ported. Corner loading doesn't affect them like it does the other two sets.
Modus 1.6:
I think these are the most musical speaker of the bunch at modest volume levels. The midrange is more balanced than either of the other two speakers. Low end extension is excellent, but with extreme levels of bass it is possible to get distortion and clipping. These speakers become a little harsh at high volumes. Not as bad as the IL40s, but they're not as "mellow" as the Emerald 99s under those extreme volumes. The Modus are rear and front ported. As a result they are sensative to corner loading.
Conclusion:
For both music and Home Theatre I think I'd pick the Modus 1.6 if I had to do it over again knowing what I know now. If the mains are crossed even as low as 40Hz they will not distort. Then they are able to play very loudly without any bass distortion. I watched a movie (swordfish) with the Modus 1.6 at reference volumes and they did not have any problems. They sound a little bit more natural than the IL40s and they cost a whole lot less.
If I were really into listening to my music at 105-110dB or so I'd be all over the Emerald 99s. They are quite listenable at extreme levels.
My only disappointment with the Wharfedales are the grills. They're pretty shoddy and seem rather flimsy.
I'm also working on getting a pair of Wharfedale Sapphire 89s to compare to the above 3 pairs of speakers and see how well they do.
Hopefully some other people will offer their opinions and comparisons.
Seth
My mains before all this were Infinity Interlude IL40 towers. I really liked them. Still do.
I bought a pair of Wharfedale Modus 1.6 towers and a pair of Wharfedale Emerald 99 towers. These are the top of the line towers from the respective lines of Wharfedale.
Here's how they sort out.
Infinity IL40:
Perhaps a little over emphasized in the midrange. Lacks the low end bass of the Emerald 99 and the Modus 1.6. When played above reference volume they become somewhat harsh in the mid and high end. They do not seem to distort even with very high levels of bass. These are rear ported and as a result are somewhat sensative to corner loading.
Emerald 99:
The midrange is bit laid back on this speaker. It has a fair bit more low end extension than the Infinity. It has a less dominant low end than the Modus 1.6. It bass is also a little "tighter" and more controlled at loud volumes. These speakers do not get harsh when cranked. They really sing at loud volume (above reference). These are front ported. Corner loading doesn't affect them like it does the other two sets.
Modus 1.6:
I think these are the most musical speaker of the bunch at modest volume levels. The midrange is more balanced than either of the other two speakers. Low end extension is excellent, but with extreme levels of bass it is possible to get distortion and clipping. These speakers become a little harsh at high volumes. Not as bad as the IL40s, but they're not as "mellow" as the Emerald 99s under those extreme volumes. The Modus are rear and front ported. As a result they are sensative to corner loading.
Conclusion:
For both music and Home Theatre I think I'd pick the Modus 1.6 if I had to do it over again knowing what I know now. If the mains are crossed even as low as 40Hz they will not distort. Then they are able to play very loudly without any bass distortion. I watched a movie (swordfish) with the Modus 1.6 at reference volumes and they did not have any problems. They sound a little bit more natural than the IL40s and they cost a whole lot less.
If I were really into listening to my music at 105-110dB or so I'd be all over the Emerald 99s. They are quite listenable at extreme levels.
My only disappointment with the Wharfedales are the grills. They're pretty shoddy and seem rather flimsy.
I'm also working on getting a pair of Wharfedale Sapphire 89s to compare to the above 3 pairs of speakers and see how well they do.
Hopefully some other people will offer their opinions and comparisons.
Seth