WB's 2010: The year we make contact NOT ENHANCED

Discussion in 'Archived Threads 2001-2004' started by JeremySt, Oct 18, 2002.

  1. JeremySt

    JeremySt Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2001
    Messages:
    1,770
    Likes Received:
    14
    Real Name:
    Jeremy
    I did a search, and could not find if someone had already said this but....
    I just picked up the Warner release off2010: THE YEAR WE MAKE CONTACT. I had held off buying the MGM release because I knew it was not enhanced for 16x9 displays. I picked up the WB release today, thinking the situation had been fixed. But.... you guessed it, even though the back cover said it is enhanced, IT IS NOT. Its the same crappy transfer thats on the previous release. Oh well, at least the WB release includes the pan and scan version. *puke*
     
  2. Patrick McCart

    Patrick McCart Lead Actor

    Joined:
    May 16, 2001
    Messages:
    7,555
    Likes Received:
    186
    Location:
    Georgia (the state)
    Real Name:
    Patrick McCart
    The WB version is just the MGM release in a snapper.
     
  3. Joseph Bolus

    Joseph Bolus Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 1999
    Messages:
    2,470
    Likes Received:
    207
    While it's true that it is not enhanced, at least it's widescreen; and it's available for about $9.95 at most Wal-Mart stores.

    It's still a better transfer, overall, than the enhanced "Forbidden Planet" DVD, which is sourced from a truly awful print.
     
  4. Gordon McMurphy

    Gordon McMurphy Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2002
    Messages:
    3,530
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: Forbidden Planet transfer being of poor quality...
    Warner may be creating a restored 2 Disc Special Edition for late 2003, so don't be buyin' the existing DVD!
    Pray for a flawless 2.55:1 anamorphic transfer! [​IMG]
    GCM
     
  5. LukeB

    LukeB Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2000
    Messages:
    2,178
    Likes Received:
    0
    I believe it's the same transfer, but no the same disc. There are different menus, and the MGM one has a featurette, but no trailer, and i believe the WB release has a trailer, but not the featurette.
     
  6. Jack Briggs

    Jack Briggs Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 1999
    Messages:
    16,738
    Likes Received:
    129
    The WB disc is the very same as the MGM disc. Not that it really matters. [​IMG]
     
  7. RobertR

    RobertR Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 1998
    Messages:
    9,708
    Likes Received:
    173
    You mean you wouldn't go for a super-duper deluxe superbit pristine with loads of extras edition of the Peter Hyams thing, Jack? [​IMG]
     
  8. LukeB

    LukeB Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2000
    Messages:
    2,178
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  9. JeremySt

    JeremySt Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2001
    Messages:
    1,770
    Likes Received:
    14
    Real Name:
    Jeremy


    Nopers. The WB release is a 2 sided, with the pan and scan version. The MGM is single sided. BOTH contain the featurette. The widescreen transfer on both discs is exactly the same: crappy and non-anamorphic.
     
  10. Eric F

    Eric F Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 1999
    Messages:
    1,810
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's unfortunate. While 2010 isn't the masterpiece 2001 is, it's still a good movie in it's own right.

    Speaking of which, anyone know the progress of the 3001 movie? I hear it come up every once in a while. Have they given up completely? It would be nice to see it done while AC Clarke was still alive (they better hurry).
     
  11. Jack Briggs

    Jack Briggs Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 1999
    Messages:
    16,738
    Likes Received:
    129


    I wished that ill-conceived idea to the cornfield. It won't happen. It won't.
     
  12. Jeff Kleist

    Jeff Kleist Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 1999
    Messages:
    11,267
    Likes Received:
    0
     

Share This Page