What's new

Watching regular cable on HDTV Display (1 Viewer)

DarrenW

Auditioning
Joined
Nov 30, 2002
Messages
11
Hi all,

Just bought a Pansonic CT-32HL42 which is a 32" HDTV Tau and I am NOT happy.

Watching DVD's are great...but watching regular cable, the image becomes pixelated and computer-ish, digitized looking. Especially on sports broadcasts (hockey, basketball).

My question is - I have heard that an HDTV set gives you a more pixelated image than a non-HDTV set (same model, except for HDTV difference.

Can anyone verify if this is myth or fact?

THanks,

Disgruntled HDTV Owner
Toronto, Ontario
 

Ottis Fletcher

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
May 16, 2002
Messages
122
I recently bought Sony KP46WT500, and digital cable looks much better over my old set Sony 36 inch Wega. I guess it depends on your TVs modes for converting non digital signals.
 

ManW_TheUncool

His Own Fool
Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2001
Messages
10,987
Location
The BK
Real Name
ManW
Darren,

Is this problem only w/ digital cable channels? Could be excessive MPEG artifacts being compounded by your TV's linedoubler. I see what you mean all the time at various stores I visit. If you can disable the linedoubler for those channels, try that.

FWIW, I'm not sure, but as I think about it, I don't generally notice the same problem to such extent on HD RPTVs. Maybe that's partly due to the softer/warmer look of RPTVs vs the harsher/punchier look of direct-views.

Also, it might be due in small part to your TV not being well calibrated. Have you done any calibrations w/ AVIA or some similar setup disc? Have you tried turning off SVM, if you can but haven't already?

_Man_
 

Steve_Tk

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2002
Messages
2,833
Cable looks fine on my HDTV. But on my friends Hitachi it looks horrible. I don't notice it on mine, but I could never watch it on his. Guess it depends on tv and what service you have. I have cable, my friend has satelite.
 

ManW_TheUncool

His Own Fool
Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2001
Messages
10,987
Location
The BK
Real Name
ManW
Steve,

Are you using digital cable?

Satellite is ALL digital, so MPEG artifacts will always factor in. Also, the Hitachi forces 540p upconversion, which may or may not compound the problem. Also, if you use the Hitachi's stretch/zoom modes, that could possibly make it worse as well.

Actually, Michael_TLV recently pointed out how bad many Hitachi's look w/ posterization/pixelation even for DVDs(!), which when done well shouldn't exhibit excessive MPEG artifacts. Check the Keohi site under the Hitachi section(?) to read more about that:

http://www.keohi.com/keohihdtv/index.htm

_Man_
 

sean_pecor

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Mar 5, 2003
Messages
137
I own the Sony kp46wt500 rptv and after some user menu and service menu tweaks, regular satellite television looks great.

With my Sony I can have different view settings for various PIC modes (Movie, Standard, Vivid, Pro). I have Standard set for standard satellite content viewing (calibrated with Avia, red push and soft picture tweaks found on the Sony HS user group site at groups.yahoo.com edge enhancement enabled to make text more crisp), and Pro set for DVD viewing (same as Standard, except with edge enhancement DISABLED).

By default the Sony treated standard satellite content rather harshly. Text (like on CNN) looked good but organic things like people and trees looked pixellated and surreal for all their detail. I suspect the default clarity enhancements work well for HD content, but since we don't watch HD content, the softer format is REALLY nice.

I'd suggest doing some research to see how much of your picture format you can tweak. Like the Avia DVD states, most tv's are shipped by default with sharpess set way too high. The softer format takes a little getting used to but the overall detail is actually more realistic and accurate.

Sean.
 

John-Miles

Screenwriter
Joined
Nov 29, 2001
Messages
1,220
I found that it really dependson ont he tv's Line doubler, out of the 36" XBR TAU and Toshiba cinema series i found the XBR was the worst on cable/sattilite, with toshiba the best.

IMHO the xbr showcased the flaws, the Tau was middle of the road and the toshiba actually improved the picture noticably.

it all depends ont he tv's line doubler liek Man said.

the harsher/punchier look of direct-views
come on now i prefer to describe it as cleaner crisper more detailed :D
 

DarrenW

Auditioning
Joined
Nov 30, 2002
Messages
11
Thanks all for the advice.

To Man: the problem is with analog signal, not digital cable.

I am a newbie and will try your suggestion of using an AVIA setup disc. I have turned off the SV, and yes it does make a difference.

Well, at this point I am hoping I will either get used to the look or the TV will miraculously get better as it passes the wearing in phase (if there is such a thing) :)

Darren
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Sponsors

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
355,195
Messages
5,072,938
Members
143,838
Latest member
phyllisbernhard
Recent bookmarks
0
Top