What's new

Using fullrange drivers (1 Viewer)

Rory Buszka

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
784
I'm looking into designing some compact mains for college, where space is tight, and I am considering these Tangband 4" full-range speakers:
http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showd...D=104525&DID=7
They won't be available until August, but I'm looking into this now so I can be ready when the drivers are available.
I want to build a pair of thin bookshelf boxes about 6" wide, 8" deep, and 24" high, ported and painted white. There will be 4 drivers per enclosure (with two sets of two drivers wired in series, and then each set wired in parallel) for about 80w RMS and 160-watt max power handling. I will be powering these with a 60w/channel reciever.
Is this a wise choice of driver? I think the 3" version of these is used in the Logitech Z-560 THX-certified multimedia speakers. The cone moves, but the phase plug is attached to the backplate.
 

Rory Buszka

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
784
actually the reason I'm going full-range is because I think crossovers are a pain to design. I may reconsider if a good enough argument is made against them.
 

Rory Buszka

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
784
Darn. They only go up to 14,000 Hz. Looks like I may need to use a tweeter after all.But they accomplish one goal: the crossover point will be really high so as not to interfere with voices. I can do this in an MMTMM fashion, but the speakers will be a lot taller, which isn't necessarily a bad thing as long as they conserve floor space. Also, what about a down-firing port?
 

Greg Monfort

Supporting Actor
Joined
May 30, 2000
Messages
884
I'm a big fan of them also. :D Check out the fullrange site/forum/archives for much more info. http://f18.parsimony.net/forum31999/
For best imaging/soundstaging, only one driver should be playing fullrange, with any others rolled off to offset baffle step loss, extend LF BW.
Assuming these will be sitting out in the open, then two on the front and two on the back in a bipole configuration is best. If not, then a four square cluster is best. Doing a MMTMM will force a lower XO point, defeating some of the FR's advantages.
Yes, the XO will be high enough to just use a cap, assuming the HF is the same efficiency as the TB in the overlapping BW.
GM
 

Rudy H

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Mar 2, 2002
Messages
105
I'm using a single TB w4-657s (4inch, aluminum cone and phase plug) as a full range surround stick tower. Should work out pretty well.
They have a rise in response in treble, but they dont sound harsh, and listening to them in freeair, they dont *need* a tweeter, but as expected, could use one. Not needed for surrounds though :)
 

rich r

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jul 29, 2001
Messages
56
Rudy,

I have the w4-657's and they sound awsome in free air!!!!!!


I am interested in your full range design keep me posted on your design..

I have yet to dessign something for my 4 w4-657's. I was thinking of a PC setup or full range towers!!
 

Rory Buszka

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
784
Here's what I've got so far:

For each speaker
4 Tangband w4-616S 4" wideband covering from 65Hz to 12kHz
1 Tangband dome tweeter (forget which model) from 12kHz to 20kHz


and then, when I save up enough, I will be using Audax 4" Aerogel midbasses to cover from 200Hz down to 54 Hz. There will be a bass box below each speaker with 4 of these woofers. But each box is going to be, like, $150 or something, so if anyone has a better idea for a 4" midbass, PLEASE let me know.

So that's 9 drivers in each speaker. The drivers will be wired in series-parallel to still present an 8-ohm load.
 

rich r

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jul 29, 2001
Messages
56
im not sure about the aero-gel for the low end.. I personally dont think the areo is not going to go any lower than the Tb will.

I would suggest something like a TB W8 or a av8 maybe. It all depends on how LOW and how much output you want.

IMO -=-i would eliminate the areogel in your design and build a tempest take care of the low end. Im sure the TB W4 will go down the 50Hz within -3Db.
 

BrendanL

Agent
Joined
Jan 23, 2002
Messages
35
Can I ask why so many drivers?
If you use multiple full range drivers you negate the best purpose of them, which is using them as a single point source. They don't of course handle that many watts, but too many drivers is not the way to get there either.

There are several bookshelf designs out there that sound great. GR-Research has some great kits, and the Adire 281 kit is also a great choice.
 

Rory Buszka

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
784
Actually, my idea for this system was sort of like the idea for my first subwoofer: Two 8's in isobaric push-pull in an EBS enclosure. Of course, it had huge trouble with bottoming out of the woofers at moderate output levels, and I was doing the math by hand (with loads of mistakes).

But this time, I think I've selected the right hodgepodge of ideas:

My beef with the 3" and/or a single fullrange driver is that it won't handle enough power. I have a reciever that puts out 60w RMS/channel. I love to listen to music, but I'm by no means a golden-ear. Some day I have to get down to Escient Systems in Carmel and hear some B&W 602's, but until that happens, I'm stuck in my blissful ignorance.

I've decided on Madisound Sledgehammer 5.25" woofers for the LF enclosure which I will build later.

I wanted to use fullrange drivers to take the crossover point out of the midrange. Way WAY out of the midrange. The crossover point for me is at 13,000 Hz. so this is what I intend to accomplish: using the fullrange drivers as really-wide-range midbasses.

The bottom line for me is to build some speakers that I'll have for years. Everything has butyl rubber surrounds. Thsi will take the utmost of MDF craftsmanship and be finished in white piano gloss.
 

AllanRW

Second Unit
Joined
Nov 30, 2001
Messages
342
Yes the stock is in.All but the 8" sub (W8-740) this will be in by July 25th.

The W4-657S or the W3-871S (W3-593S) meet your needs.
More highs out of the 3" than the 4"


Al
Nuera Acoustic
 

Cam S

Screenwriter
Joined
Jan 11, 2002
Messages
1,524
Allan, I live in Kelowna, how much would the shipping be for a couple of the 4" FR drivers?? Also, will you guys have any box designs and XO designs up on the website soon?

BTW, I noticed on the Neura Acoustic banner a really nice looking cast frame subwoofer, what size is it and will you guys be carrying woofer's larger than 8"??
 

AllanRW

Second Unit
Joined
Nov 30, 2001
Messages
342
I was just saying that our W4-657S is in stock and will hanle the power you are looking at.


Al
Nuera Acoustic
 

Hank Frankenberg

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 13, 1998
Messages
2,573
Rory, I found this in my MCM flyer: 55-1853 4" shielded aluminum cone; frequency response 60 - 17 kHz 1" dia copper voice coil; Xmax 2.55 mm. $10.75 Anyway, it looks good on WinsISD: 250.5 in^3 cabinet with a 1.5" dia port 6.8" long and an F3 of just over 64 Hz. Not a round frame driver though :-(

If you want to go lower, I really like their 55-1855 5" 45 -15 kHz. I believe these are Tangband drivers.
 

Rory Buszka

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
784
I was interested by the midbasses with the double surrounds. Philips makes stereos with wOOx, which is a passive radiator with double surrounds and it has an excursion of about .75" in either direction.

I'm using multiple drivers to get that sort of effect that you have with the guy on the labels for Maxell tapes, being blown away by the sound. also, they look cool. Sort of a psychoacoustic thing. I want these things to be able to crank when I'm in the mood for loud.

Also, I might add that I'm using a very nice Blueprint 10" subwoofer, so the cabinets with the 5" woofers will be driven by the L/R channels in the reciever to get good bass from the mains so I can run the sub only for the lowest sub-basement. Then, when I have a house and everything, I will probably build some nicer speakers and use these out in the garage or in my computer room or whatever. But during college, I probably won't get to take my subwoofer there (space limitations and all that), so I'll drive the 5's with the 120-watt sub amplifier. I don't intend for it to go that low, because then the neighbors will complain.
 

Hank Frankenberg

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 13, 1998
Messages
2,573
Allan, ok the 1855's are not made by Tangband. Sorry for the wrong guess. That's fine, they still look good. So, I assume the 1853's are Tangband.
 

AllanRW

Second Unit
Joined
Nov 30, 2001
Messages
342
No , the 55-1853 is not a TB.
MCM has only the TB W3-532 left in stock and will not have anymore TB drivers in stock for a LONG TIME IF EVER.
The stopped a order with TB so what they have is all that they will have for a LONG TIME.
IF EVER AGAIN.

Al
I have cases of the 55-1855 sitting here.
Was going to build the line but I am to busy with Nuera now to play .
 

Hank Frankenberg

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 13, 1998
Messages
2,573
Well, excuuuuse meee :) BTW, I know for a fact why MCM may never carry TB again, Allan. What is your pricing on the new TB 10" in various quantities?
 

AllanRW

Second Unit
Joined
Nov 30, 2001
Messages
342
We do not carry the 10" sub only the 8" W8-740.
The other subs we were not happy with for one reason or another.
The 8" was a hands down winner of the lot.
We may carry some more of the subs after some changes are done to them.
Till then it is just the 8"

AL
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Forum statistics

Threads
357,052
Messages
5,129,646
Members
144,285
Latest member
acinstallation715
Recent bookmarks
0
Top