So now this one kinda looks like Romeo and Juliet - only instead of Montagues and Capulets we got... Vampire and Werewolves!You didn't know this? Check out post #3 in this thread.
This film is still a good while off. At least there will be some Fangoria coverage next issue to help tide me over.
Len Wiseman: "At first I thought, that's the lamest idea [writing the movie as a vampire-werewolf Romeo and Juliet-story] I've ever heard in my life."
I think he had it right the first time. Now, if one were trying to bring something like The Munsters to the big screen, that might be a great direction to take, . . . .
"Ripley and Hicks"? I don't remember any romance there. Respect, certainly. Affection, maybe. No romance.
To those who like the idea of a Romeo and Juliet-scenario, why not just see or rent the DiCaprio (or some other recent twenty-something) revisionist version? What's the appeal of this?
I don't see how this can work without being laughably incredible (or is that "incredibly laughable"???). Of course, it depends on what "works" for you.
The anticipatory reactions in this thread seem to indicate that the points of appeal about this film to a mass audience are (in order) (1) the girl in slick leather and (2) the "action sequences" (vampires with guns and "martial arts"?!?!?). (Do the werewolves get RPG's?)
I note in the postings no werewolf pictures. Are they hiding the lycanthropic make-up (effects?)?
This might make a good "action movie", but I hate to tell Mr. Wiseman: "unique" it ain't!
I note in the postings no werewolf pictures. Are they hiding the lycanthropic make-up (effects?)?They're in the trailer. I wish they had more fur but thought they looked okay *shrug*