What's new

TV transmissions from years ago- how common are they? (1 Viewer)

Scott Strang

Screenwriter
Joined
May 28, 1999
Messages
1,146
I've heard of this happening, but have never known someone personally that saw them.

Has anyone here seen them?
 

Jack Briggs

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 3, 1999
Messages
16,805
I'll get back with you after I finish listening to this radio broadcast I'm listening to on the filling in my tooth.
 

RobertR

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 19, 1998
Messages
10,675
I've heard of a lot of things happening.

It's coming up with a sound reason for thinking that some of them are what they claim to be that's the hard part.
 

Jesse Skeen

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 24, 1999
Messages
5,038
I have a Beta tape with the tail end of the original airing of "Sybil" in 1977; someone taped something else over it so the end's all that's left, would've been cool to have a copy of the whole thing the first time it was shown :angry:
 

Ike

Screenwriter
Joined
Jan 14, 2000
Messages
1,672
I believe he is talking about TV signals still floating around in the air that were aired long ago...like how some people say that if there were life on other planets, they'd be watching I Love Lucy right about now because the transmissions never go away.
 

Scott Strang

Screenwriter
Joined
May 28, 1999
Messages
1,146
Supposedly it's possible for TV (and FM radio which TV is anyway) signals to end up "bounced" back to Earth even though they may be many years (20 years although they could be of any age) old. I read about this actually happening years ago, but I really can't remember where.
 

CharlesD

Screenwriter
Joined
Mar 30, 2000
Messages
1,493
how some people say that if there were life on other planets, they'd be watching I Love Lucy right about now because the transmissions never go away
Even if there were intelligent beings on even the nearest star (4.5 light years) they would never have been watching 'I Love Lucy'. First of all there are many sources of TV and radio signals on Earth using a variety of frequencies. At any given times multiple sources are using the same frequency, only there are far enough apart so as to not interfere with each other.

The transmitters are designed only to transmit to limited areas. From a distance in space there would only be a faint mish-mash of conflicting radio-frequency emissions. A radio-astronomer once calculated that the all the TV & radio on Earth could not be detected more than 1 or 2 light years away by the best equipment currently available.
 

Steve Enemark

Second Unit
Joined
Jun 30, 1997
Messages
482
[sarcasm]

...and we all know our technology is superior to any alien civilizations', known or unknown. Therefore, it is impossible for aliens to monitor our TV/radio traffic.

[/sarcasm]
 

John Miles

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jan 16, 2000
Messages
236
...and we all know our technology is superior to any alien civilizations', known or unknown. Therefore, it is impossible for aliens to monitor our TV/radio traffic.
It's safe to say the alien communications receivers have to obey the same laws of information theory and channel capacity (Shannon) that ours do. The real problem with weak-signal TV reception isn't power; it's bandwidth. Wideband signals like TV have to compete with a lot more thermal noise power than narrowband signals do, and once the signal-to-noise ratio degrades beyond a certain point due to distance, the signal becomes fundamentally unrecoverable.
For interplanetary communication, you need to use a low data rate relative to the channel's bandwidth; a correlated link that offers process gain; and/or high antenna gain in the direction of interest. Commercial TV and radio broadcasts don't meet any of these criteria.
It's completely impossible for any sort of unintentionally-generated echoes to be received across interstellar space. Even if we wanted to do this on purpose, we couldn't, not without sending probably quadrillions of watts through very high-gain antennas at a known reflector body, and taking who-knows-how-much DSP time to extract the signal, which (by the way) would make a 300-baud modem look like God's own DSL line.
There was indeed an article on "long-delayed echoes" (LDEs) in the ham radio magazine QST many years ago, but it was an April Fools' joke. :)
 

Jack Briggs

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 3, 1999
Messages
16,805
Any of you ever experience multiplexing problems when listening to FM broadcasts via your fillings? I'm also having problems with signal drift. There may be a sensitivity issue here. Do gold fillings pull in cleaner signals? This is driving me crazy.
 

RobertR

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 19, 1998
Messages
10,675
Do gold fillings pull in cleaner signals?
The soundstage becomes wider, the bass becomes tighter and has more slam and extension, the midrange attains greater focus and liquidity, there is improved pacing and dynamics, and micro details are more readily discernible. The difference is night and day (except when I'm not told about the gold fillings).

And anyone who says otherwise doesn't have my Golden Ears.
 

andrew markworthy

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 30, 1999
Messages
4,762
This is a really dumb related question. Don't a lot of our radio signals rely on the existence of the Heaviside Layer to bounce them off? Suppose this is a really rare phenomenon - would life on other planets have bothered with radio at all (because it could only be used over short distances). And if not, would they look out for radio signals as a sign of other civilizations trying to contact them?
 

Jack Briggs

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 3, 1999
Messages
16,805
"...except when I'm not told about the gold fillings..."
I am willing to bet that you do not subscribe to Absolute Sound. One thing, though--didn't someone say that gold fillings also render broadcasts with more front-to-back depth? And I like a really focused soundstage.

Or should I give up and listen to FM broadcasts with a brass bed?
 

RicP

Screenwriter
Joined
Feb 29, 2000
Messages
1,126
Do gold fillings pull in cleaner signals
Jack, if you paint your teeth green, your reception will improve immeasurably.
Of course there may be social implications, but Hey...that's the price we pay for good sound. :)
 

Jack Briggs

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 3, 1999
Messages
16,805
You're right! I forgot the green paint thing. If it can work with CDs, then it can work with gold fillings. That's my solution, then. But I'll have to think of something to tell the people at work. No matter, though--anything for a cleaner signal with more front-to-back depth.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Forum statistics

Threads
357,059
Messages
5,129,801
Members
144,281
Latest member
acinstallation240
Recent bookmarks
0
Top