Scott Strang
Screenwriter
- Joined
- May 28, 1999
- Messages
- 1,146
I've heard of this happening, but have never known someone personally that saw them.
Has anyone here seen them?
Has anyone here seen them?
how some people say that if there were life on other planets, they'd be watching I Love Lucy right about now because the transmissions never go away
Even if there were intelligent beings on even the nearest star (4.5 light years) they would never have been watching 'I Love Lucy'. First of all there are many sources of TV and radio signals on Earth using a variety of frequencies. At any given times multiple sources are using the same frequency, only there are far enough apart so as to not interfere with each other.
The transmitters are designed only to transmit to limited areas. From a distance in space there would only be a faint mish-mash of conflicting radio-frequency emissions. A radio-astronomer once calculated that the all the TV & radio on Earth could not be detected more than 1 or 2 light years away by the best equipment currently available.
...and we all know our technology is superior to any alien civilizations', known or unknown. Therefore, it is impossible for aliens to monitor our TV/radio traffic.
It's safe to say the alien communications receivers have to obey the same laws of information theory and channel capacity (Shannon) that ours do. The real problem with weak-signal TV reception isn't power; it's bandwidth. Wideband signals like TV have to compete with a lot more thermal noise power than narrowband signals do, and once the signal-to-noise ratio degrades beyond a certain point due to distance, the signal becomes fundamentally unrecoverable.
For interplanetary communication, you need to use a low data rate relative to the channel's bandwidth; a correlated link that offers process gain; and/or high antenna gain in the direction of interest. Commercial TV and radio broadcasts don't meet any of these criteria.
It's completely impossible for any sort of unintentionally-generated echoes to be received across interstellar space. Even if we wanted to do this on purpose, we couldn't, not without sending probably quadrillions of watts through very high-gain antennas at a known reflector body, and taking who-knows-how-much DSP time to extract the signal, which (by the way) would make a 300-baud modem look like God's own DSL line.
There was indeed an article on "long-delayed echoes" (LDEs) in the ham radio magazine QST many years ago, but it was an April Fools' joke.
Do gold fillings pull in cleaner signals?
The soundstage becomes wider, the bass becomes tighter and has more slam and extension, the midrange attains greater focus and liquidity, there is improved pacing and dynamics, and micro details are more readily discernible. The difference is night and day (except when I'm not told about the gold fillings).
And anyone who says otherwise doesn't have my Golden Ears.
"...except when I'm not told about the gold fillings..."
I am willing to bet that you do not subscribe to Absolute Sound. One thing, though--didn't someone say that gold fillings also render broadcasts with more front-to-back depth? And I like a really focused soundstage.
Or should I give up and listen to FM broadcasts with a brass bed?
Do gold fillings pull in cleaner signals
Jack, if you paint your teeth green, your reception will improve immeasurably.
Of course there may be social implications, but Hey...that's the price we pay for good sound.