is this another proof that universal players are waste of money? I think it is!![]()
To me, it proves that you need a universal player (or two machines) to enjoy both HD releases of TB.
Jason
is this another proof that universal players are waste of money? I think it is!Thats why I own seperate DVD-A and SACD players. Better audio quality then the universals I have had a chance to listen. So I guess we agree on this pointSeriously though, there is too much good music on both formats that I am not going to spite myself over something as foolish as a format preference.
J
That means the video single for the dance remix of "Introduction" isn't viewable on non-PAL playersTrust me, you haven't missed anything. Just a collection of images of nature, etc, some digitally manipulated. It really isn't v. interesting.
I wasn't all that taken with the remix. Having said that, there have been quite a few over the years, so maybe I'm just jaded.
is this another proof that universal players are waste of money? I think it is!BS!
Having both formats at hand I have wider variety music to choose from.
Also the TB SACD is the original Quad mix from the '70 's,the new MC DVD-A will use a different mix,so it will worth the wait IMO.
the new MC DVD-A will use a different mixTubular Bells 2003 is a new recording by Oldfield of the original piece. It is not a remastered or remixed version of the original 1973 work.
The same goes for the upcoming m/c DVD-A disc of Tubular Bells 2003. Oldfield himself completed the 5.1 mix for TB2003 in March (approximately). And from the sample offered with the release of TB2003, the m/c is something I'm greatly looking forward to.
Tubular Bells 2003 is a new recording by Oldfield of the original piece. It is not a remastered or remixed version of the original 1973 work.I'm aware of that,but that's in 2 ch right?
I was talking about the Quad mix[SACD] of the original TB which wasn't completed by MO himself, and is totally different from the 2 ch mix.It was done by Phil Newell,not even the original recording engineer.You just comfirmed that the new recording was mixed by MO,so it is safe to assume it will be different from the Quad SACD mix, is it not?
Also the SACD is a 4.0 mix,so the 5.1 mixing alone spells "difference" in my book.
You just comfirmed that the new recording was mixed by MO,so it is safe to assume it will be different from the Quad SACD mix, is it not?Lewis, maybe it's just me misunderstanding what you're saying.
As you know, the SACD currently available is the original 70s quad mix of the 1973 Tubular Bells.
The new 5.1 mix (presumed to be a DVD-A release) is for Tubular Bells 2003 and not the original.
These are two distinct projects. Oldfield has not gone back and remixed the original TB for 5.1 audio, although the artist did mention that he's thinking about doing that for his original Ommadawn piece. TB2003 has already been released in Europe as a "plain" stereo release, although versions are available which contain a DVD featuring an 8-minute sample of the 5.1 mix in Dolby Digital and DTS. I grabbed an import and the 5.1 mix is really terrific.
Sorry if I'm just repeating something you already know, but your statement left me with the impression that you were still talking as though the new 5.1 mix was for the original TB.
The new 5.1 mix (presumed to be a DVD-A release) is for Tubular Bells 2003 and not the original.That's exactly what I was talking about.
My order for TB2K3 Redbook CD is on hold on amazon.com until mid-August. Where can I order it faster?
Because this is an import-only title at this point and you're an Amazon customer already, try the Canadian Amazon site (the Canada release of TB2003 has no copy protection and the DVD video is in NTSC). You can also order from the U.K. site. I order from the British Amazon site every once in a while and have never been disappointed.