Restoration was shown at the Academy Museum in LA on the 3rd.
Another angle
Another angle
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And then afterwards leave the other restorations (prior or after buyout) behind unreleased?Would imagine the work is being done to tie into the release of the upcoming 3rd film, which is slated for October release. They haven't officially announced this remaster for physical media or streaming yet.
The current Blu-ray is already pretty amazing (and better than the "before" sections on this video),
I think the title needs amending, as per the talk before the screening, the restoration is 4K, the 65mm footage was scanned at 8K & the Vistavision 35mm footage at 6K, but it was not “restored” at 8K.
It's mentioned the "before" examples are raw scans before color correction and cleanup. Still slightly misleading since the raw scans are supposed to be low contrast to allow for more latitude in color correction, but it does highlight how important grading is to get the proper look.
Well, then, that's "just" the routine work for creating a new master. Which is the issue with these before / after, especially when there already was a previous work. You’d think “oh wow, it’s so much better than the last time”, but actually, it’s a comparison with the rawest thing they could show, and it offers so little insight to the viewers. In this case, on top of it, it doesn’t look like the raw scan, as it’s actually pretty clean and stable.It's mentioned the "before" examples are raw scans before color correction and cleanup.
I was there last Thursday and the restoration is truly remarkable. Writer-director Steven Lisberger was there (along with FX maestro Harrison Ellenshaw and others, which is weird that they weren't on-stage for a panel) and before the show, I overheard him say that this was the best the film ever looked.