1. Sign-up to become a member, and most of the ads you see will disappear. It only takes 30 seconds to sign up, so join the discussion today!
    Dismiss Notice

Toy Story 4 (2019)

Discussion in 'Movies' started by Jake Lipson, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:37 AM.

  1. Jake Lipson

    Jake Lipson Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    1,401
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Real Name:
    Jake Lipson
    Pixar's 2019 release will be Toy Story 4.

    I'm not really sure if we need a Toy Story 4 since the third one left it in such a wonderful place to end, but I have to assume Pixar knows the value of its flagship franchise and wouldn't trot out another sequel if they thought it was going to be bad. There is a big difference in terms of producing a bad sequel to something as iconic and loved as Toy Story, as opposed to producing a bad sequel to, say, Cars. Hopefully they understand that.

    Josh Cooley, who directed "Riley's First Date?", the short on the Inside Out Blu-ray, is directing in his feature film directing debut. He was originally co-director under John Lasseter, but Lasseter left the project (even before his sabbatical.)

    I don't want to get into the sabbatical here because we've already been discussing that in the allegations thread in the off-topic forum. However, as a result of his sabbatical, it has come out that Rishada Jones and Eric McCormick, who were originally announced to write this film, are no longer attached to it. That was news to me when it was mentioned in the context of Lasseter's sabbatical, because I don't think their departure had ever been publicly announced before that. I'm wondering when they left and, more importantly, who is replacing them.

    I'm also curious about he timetable of this film, in terms of the narrative. It has been delayed a couple times, originally having been set for this year, and then 2018, before settling on 2019. That means nine years will have passed in between Toy Story 3 and this film. We've seen the toys during that interval in a few Toy Story Toons shorts, as well as the Toy Story of Terror and Toy Story That Time Forgot TV specials for ABC, but those are shorts and while they are entertaining, nothing much happens in them that changes the state of the world for the toys.

    For the other Toy Story films, the time in between films in the real world had also elapsed within the story. If that happens again, then Bonnie, who inherited the toys from Andy in the terrific ending of the last film, will have likely aged up to a point where she doesn't play with the toys anymore either. While Toy Story 3 is a fantastic film, I'm not really sure I want to go through that arc again in the fourth one, because it would be the same thing we just saw. If they decide to go the Finding Dory route and *not* age up the character, then it's possible that Bonnie could need a new voice actor. I think the same girl from the film played her i the shorts, but the most recent of those, Toy Story That Time Forgot, was in 2014, only four years after her film, so her voice hadn't really changed that much in that time. Now, it might be a different story.

    Also, obviously I don't know how much of this is being kept if Jones and McCormick have left, but it was previously stated that the new film would be a love story between Woody and Bo Peep, whom he is going to try to find. I think that's a cool idea, since they certainly made her absence felt in Toy Story 3. However, given the gap of several years between Toy Story 2 and 3 -- not to mention whatever kind of gap they'll have between 3 and 4 -- I'm curious how they will handle that. If Andy got rid of Bo Peep at some point during the years between 2 and 3, which even in terms of the story was a long time ago now, then why is Woody suddenly going after her now? As in, why didn't he do it years ago when she was first given away? And how would he even begin to figure out where she went? She could have ended up anywhere. Obviously, too, he wants *his* Bo Peep, not another copy of her (in the same sense that there are copies of Buzz and the other toys, there are probably multiple Bo Peeps manufactured in this world.) So, while I think this might be a cool story, I also think there are some logical questions they'll need to answer in the narrative to make it work.

    So...yeah. All of that has been on my mind lately, and so I thought I would start the thread.

    Your thoughts?
     
  2. Matt Hough

    Matt Hough Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Messages:
    16,846
    Likes Received:
    5,035
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Real Name:
    Matt Hough
    The fourth movie could be a prequel to any one of the previous three depending on where the writers needed the timeline to go. Yes, they'd have to get new voice actors for the human characters, but again, the story they've come up with will determine what they need in terms of human beings in the cast of characters. And had they recorded Don Rickles before his death or will Mr. Potato Head have to be recast with a voice double? Not unprecedented, of course, and possibly if there was new writing involved, the voice duties may be split between old Rickles recordings and a new voice double.
     
  3. Jake Lipson

    Jake Lipson Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    1,401
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Real Name:
    Jake Lipson
    I doubt very much that 4 is a prequel to any of them, because a) it's going out with "4" in the title and b) assuming Woody accomplishes his goal to find Bo Peep, he would have to lose her again before the events of the third film, since she is not in that one.

    Thank you for bringing up Don Rickles. I meant to do that last night in my original post but forgot. Unfortunately, the answer is no, he had not recorded for the new film.

    https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/don-rickles-toy-story-4-comedian-didnt-record-his-part-before-he-passed-away-992013

    Jim Varney (Slinky Dog) passed away in 2000 after the release of Toy Story 2, so his role was recast with Blake Clark for the third film. They could do that again, but Don Rick;es' voice is pretty iconic so may be hard to find a replacement for. Another option would be to write the character out, as they did when Pixar animator Joe Ranft (who provided the voice of Wheezy in Toy Story 2) died in 2005. Wheezy was simply not seen again after that, despite the fact that Woody's efforts to save him from being sold kicked off the plot of Toy Story 2.

    Or, if they are really lucky, they could take a cue from Cars 3 and bring Mr. Potato Head back with Don Rickles voicing him, via outtakes and other pre-recorded material that went unused in the first three films. Their ability to do this obviously depends upon how much old recordings of him they have tucked away in their vaults, but Newman only recorded one film for them before he died and Rickles recorded three, so it's very possible that they might have several hours of old tapes.

    This is an interesting and unfortunate challenge that I wish they didn't have to face, but it will be interesting to see how they handle it.

    Also potentially affected is Estelle Harris as Mrs. Potato Head. She is, thankfully, very much alive and should be back, but since her role is always connected to that of her husband, it may well depend on what they decide to do with him. Particularly in a movie that is supposed to be a love story between Woody and Bo Pep, it would be an interesting juxtaposition if Mrs. Potato Head is there by herself. But as Andy told Bonnie in the end of the third one, "You've got to keep them together since they're madly in love."
     
  4. Brett_B

    Brett_B Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 1999
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    610
    In regards to a possible plot, as was mentioned previously with the time passed since the last one why not have Andy be married and has a young child himself. And, if Bonnie is too old for the toys Andy gets them back to give to his child where Andy will be reunited, and playing, with all of his former toys teaching his child the adventures that these toys have had.
     
  5. Matt Hough

    Matt Hough Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Messages:
    16,846
    Likes Received:
    5,035
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Real Name:
    Matt Hough
    Wonderful idea, Brett!
     
  6. Jake Lipson

    Jake Lipson Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    1,401
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Real Name:
    Jake Lipson
    I like that idea, too -- although, as far as Andy knows, these toys have never left his house except when accompanied by him, so he is only aware of the adventures he's made up for them. I doubt he'd be telling his kids about the adventures we know they've had.
     
  7. Brett_B

    Brett_B Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 1999
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    610
    I was thinking more about the adventures he was teaching Bonnie at the end of Toy Story 3.
     
  8. Jake Lipson

    Jake Lipson Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    1,401
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Real Name:
    Jake Lipson
    Yeah, that works nicely. Then by the time Andy's kid grows up, Bonnie will have kids, and the toys can just keep getting passed between the two of them forever.
     
    Brett_B likes this.
  9. Sam Favate

    Sam Favate Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    Messages:
    7,134
    Likes Received:
    1,806
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Sam Favate
    That ties in nicely with the theory that Jessie belonged to Andy's mom, and she was the little girl who gave her away.

    Tom Hanks likes the idea: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/tom-hanks-thinks-toy-story-theory-about-andys-mom-is-fantastic_us_5903bd5be4b0bb2d086ea066
     
    Brett_B likes this.
  10. Jake Lipson

    Jake Lipson Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    1,401
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Real Name:
    Jake Lipson
    Wouldn't that be a massive coincidence?

    If Andy and Bonnie deliberately pass the toys between each other for their kids, that makes sense. But for Andy's mom to also be Jessie's owner, and then for Jessie to coincidentally find her way back to that family's ownership, is...nice, but a bit of a plausibility stretch.
     
  11. Mike Frezon

    Mike Frezon Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2001
    Messages:
    43,810
    Likes Received:
    8,792
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Rensselaer, NY
    I'm loving everything I'm reading in this thread!

    And that's the first I've heard of the "Andy's mom theory!" That's really cool.
     
    Jake Lipson likes this.
  12. Jeff Cooper

    Jeff Cooper Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2000
    Messages:
    1,759
    Likes Received:
    271
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    But what about Andy's DAD!?!?!?!?!
     
  13. Jake Lipson

    Jake Lipson Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    1,401
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Real Name:
    Jake Lipson
    You're probably being sarcastic, but...

    Obviously, Andy's dad is either divorced from his mother or had passed away a long time prior to the first film. (I've heard some people who in my opinion are overanalyzing suspect that the move in the first film is to get a fresh start after Andy's dad's death, but that theory doesn't work because that kid is way too happy for a kid whose dad just died.) I really don't think this is much of an issue.
     

Share This Page