What’s Up Doc Rated G.
Yes, and everyone was good with that! But not for much longer, which I find a sad journey for the rating.
What’s Up Doc Rated G.
What i find ridiculous is twofold--tons of movies are G in spirit, but have maybe a smidgen of cussing or innuendo to push into PG or PG13. And such inconsequential additions somehow make it more worthy of teen or adult viewing!
The other thing is nowadays the nebulous "thematic" or "action" PG labeling can cover everything from a hint of controversy or a kitten tumbling off a sofa. I mean, c'mon! No wonder the G rating has been eviscerated, and not having any real substance anymore.
In 1968 at the dawn of ratings, the musical Oliver! got a G rating without a thought. Yet now it'd no doubt be a PG13 since it runs the gamut of violence, smoking, "thematic elements" and Lord knows what else. Yet it's perfectly suitable for all ages, albeit with the deftly handled elements described. And just think--Kubrick's 2001 still retains its G rating--one of the most sophisticated, thought provoking movies ever made, yet today if given a chance it'd be slapped with a PG for some crazy reason. Apes hitting each other?
This may all sound like a bunch of hooha to discuss, but I think it's a legitimate topic the way perceptions can be unfairly distorted for essentially marketing purposes, and not actual content.
It wouldn’t surprise me if this film gets a PG or TV14 modification in the future, due to a look given to a woman by a man, or a line of dialog that someone now finds objectionable. Sad.What’s Up Doc Rated G.
It wouldn’t surprise me if this film gets a PG or TV14 modification in the future, due to a look given to a woman by a man, or a line of dialog that someone now finds objectionable. Sad.
Disney was popular enough to cope with it but even they eventually gave up the ghost and embraced PG for their animated fare...