What's new

The Thing – 16x9 Enhanced? (1 Viewer)

Joined
Jun 24, 2002
Messages
44
Hello,

I’ve read reports that some R1 copies of John Carpenter’s The Thing are 16x9 enhanced even if it’s not mentioned on the box... I know that my copy is not.

My question is the following: If these reports are true, is there a way to spot this from the packaging?

Thanks for your help.
lpr
 

Gordon McMurphy

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2002
Messages
3,530
Oh, no! I wish it were true, but it's hooey.

I'd love to see Universal create a new 2 disc edition with a new transfer, all the deleted scenes (in widescreen, of course), DTS etc, but... who knows.

2003 should be a good year for vintage Universal titles.


Gordy
 

Dave F

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 15, 1999
Messages
2,885
The situation is reversed, I think. I remember hearing reports of some packaging that indicated a 16x9 transfer, but it was the same old non-anamorphic version on the disc.

-Dave
 

Dave H

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2000
Messages
6,167
I remember hearing reports of some packaging that indicated a 16x9 transfer, but it was the same old non-anamorphic version on the disc.
I have heard reports about this, as well. Pretty odd, but this is Universal we are talking about, so it doesn't surprise me.
 

Scott Varney

Agent
Joined
Dec 4, 2001
Messages
46
If I remember correctly, the free copies of the movie that some retailers were giving away with the PC/XBox game were marked as 16:9 but were the same discs as released in the Collector's Edition.
 

Rob Tomlin

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2000
Messages
4,506
The situation is reversed, I think. I remember hearing reports of some packaging that indicated a 16x9 transfer, but it was the same old non-anamorphic version on the disc.
Exactly.
The only reason I don't own this yet is because it's not anamorphic. :frowning:
 

Jason Hennigan

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Feb 16, 1999
Messages
192
Real Name
Jason Hennigan
The disks given away as promos for the game were marked 16:9, but are the same as the original disk, no 16:9.
 

Sean Patrick

Supporting Actor
Joined
Apr 22, 1999
Messages
732
for what it's worth, it's not a bad transfer. doesn't look too shabby scaled to 16:9 on my tv.

that being said it's one of many titles (The Game, Abyss, etc) that are considered "really good" non-16:9 titles that I fear will never get the 16:9 treatment they deserve.
 

Dave Morton

Supporting Actor
Joined
Oct 19, 2000
Messages
753
Real Name
Dave
I have to agree with Sean. I have this movie and the picture quality is quite good. I picked it up for $9.99 and am quite pleased.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Forum statistics

Threads
357,052
Messages
5,129,668
Members
144,281
Latest member
blitz
Recent bookmarks
0
Top