Will_B
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2001
- Messages
- 4,730
Bad kerning on the dictionary definition, woah! That fourth line is way too tight. The whole paragraph needs to be rejiggered.
Aside from that, I could see this alleged intro serving fairly well as a sort of alternate idea intro. An optional into -- because the film doesn't need it, the fires of the hellish LA was about as obvious as one could get, even without the Eden imagery that this new animation provides.
Looks like a well done rendition of something that Ridley Scott must have wanted to try out back in the day. So kudos for trying it out and presenting it. ...Even if, after it turned out well, it doesn't seem necessary, and risks being cliche due to overuse. (The Prophecy series with Christopher Walken was one of my favorites to use of this kind of opening, but there are many others).
So in summary, I am pleased they tried it, and did it well. And having seen it, I don't think it is needed at all and would have set it aside. Kept it as an extra.
Additionally, on a purely personal note, I don't care for that "breaking through" artwork, the second artwork that appears in the sequence (maybe some art historians here can name the painting I am referring to). I liked the rest of them though.
Aside from that, I could see this alleged intro serving fairly well as a sort of alternate idea intro. An optional into -- because the film doesn't need it, the fires of the hellish LA was about as obvious as one could get, even without the Eden imagery that this new animation provides.
Looks like a well done rendition of something that Ridley Scott must have wanted to try out back in the day. So kudos for trying it out and presenting it. ...Even if, after it turned out well, it doesn't seem necessary, and risks being cliche due to overuse. (The Prophecy series with Christopher Walken was one of my favorites to use of this kind of opening, but there are many others).
So in summary, I am pleased they tried it, and did it well. And having seen it, I don't think it is needed at all and would have set it aside. Kept it as an extra.
Additionally, on a purely personal note, I don't care for that "breaking through" artwork, the second artwork that appears in the sequence (maybe some art historians here can name the painting I am referring to). I liked the rest of them though.