- Joined
- Jul 3, 1997
- Messages
- 66,715
- Real Name
- Ronald Epstein
Hi Ron, what makes this a "Special Edition"?
I have not seen this film, but the poster makes it out as a farce rather than traditional...Am I wong here?Iirc correctly, it's an all-new and cleaned-up transfer, plus it has a brand-new audio commentary by an expert on the film
I've never seen The Hallelujah Trail, but as a fan of many Westerns from the 20s to the 70s, I'm interested. I did read somewhere, however, that it has some "outdated cultural depictions." Even though I like old Westerns, like many I don't like and find difficult to watch racist depictions of indigenous Americans. By any chance would someone familiar with the film let those of us who haven't seen it know how much such things are in this movie?
Ask Kino and Amazon because that's how they're describing it with the following bonus material.Hi Ron, what makes this a "Special Edition"?
That's a good question; what does make a "Special Edition"? I suppose a fairly bog standard transfer does if it comes in a Steelbook or Digibook. There's plenty of great transfers with good extras that are not called Special Editions. Like a lot of 4K releases, I suppose it's mostly a marketing thing.Hi Ron, what makes this a "Special Edition"?
It’s a broad comedy which made me laugh not once!I have not seen this film, but the poster makes it out as a farce rather than traditional...Am I wong here?
not once? Yikes.It’s a broad comedy which made me laugh not once!
I never enjoy comedy westerns. I only went to see it because I loved seeing films in Cinerama. It does have some excellent photography with splendid scenic views - and a great music score.not once? Yikes.
Cat Balou was a fun romp!!I never enjoy comedy westerns. I only went to see it because I loved seeing films in Cinerama. It does have some excellent photography with splendid scenic views - and a great music score.
Cat Balou was a fun romp!!
I have not seen this film, but the poster makes it out as a farce rather than traditional...Am I wong here?
The overture and the titles are the only thing worthwhile.If it's the same transfer that's been on Amazon Prime for months, it looks nice. Nice, however, doesn't really cut it with something filmed in 65mm. A reduction negative is - a reduction negative. I saw it the day it opened - to be clear - it's a Cinerama film in name only - it has nothing to do with real Cinerama. I loved mostly any large format film and I certainly loved Miss Remick and Mr. Lancaster. I found it terrible back then and terrible now. As to its treatment of indigenes Americans, it's a 1960s movie about the old west. It wan't made today nor should it be judged as would a modern film. Hell, you may as well stay away from just about every western ever made for the era.
More like if How The West Was Won and IA(Mx4)W got married and then adopted a kid. If you expect it to be of the caliber of those two only, you'll be disappointed. Otherwise it is a well-photographed film with a great score and far more entertaining than just about anything that has a 'vs" in the title of recent vintage.This film sounds interesting enough to see at least ounce as it's supposedly the Western version of Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World
. . . and Pamela Tiffin, who is the only reason I might buy this disc!I never enjoy comedy westerns. I only went to see it because I loved seeing films in Cinerama. It does have some excellent photography with splendid scenic views - and a great music score.
...not a visit from the word police!!! Oh myNope...just wong on the spelling of "wrong."