O.K. I just got back from a screening of François Ozon's Swimming Pool. An interesting movie and I've never heard the audience talk so much as the final credits rolled. Basically, I think the last part of the film shows that most of the film was an illusion by Sarah Morton (Charlotte Rampling) and that Ludivine Sagnier's "Julie" never existed in the way depicted. But, then again, Ozon could just be messing with us a bit. One thing for sure, I'm eagerly anticipating the DVD of this movie and, hopefully, some insight regarding what's what. Or maybe "what's what" is supposed to be a personal interpretation in this film? The press can't seem to agree on this one and there are as many theories about it as there are critics. Thoughts and comments?