What's new

Randy Korstick

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2000
Messages
5,839
I cannot get past Denise Richards being cast as a nuclear physicist in that one -- probably the second worst Bond girl casting after Tonya Roberts as a geologist in A View To a Kill.
Agreed Tonya Roberts glaring at the camera and shaking her hair as she reads her lines has to be the poster child for bad acting. The all time worst performance in any Bond movie. Other than her performance I actually find A View to a Kill to be fun in a Roger Moore bubble gum Bond kind a way. My least favorite Moore Bond is Octopussy. Just something dull and lifeless about that one which is odd for a Moore Bond film. It probably needed someone like Connery or Dalton to pull it off.
 

Lord Dalek

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2005
Messages
7,107
Real Name
Joel Henderson
The main problem with Octopussy is its coming off of one of the best (and most highly underrated IMHO) Bonds in the shape of For Your Eyes Only which demonstrated that Moore's Bond didn't need to have that "lighter touch" he insisted on for most of his run. Although to be fair, the style whiplash isn't as bad with Octopussy as it is with the film that immediately proceeded FYEO.

Now you can say the same thing about Spectre (how they deliberately tried to make Skyfall II and failed miserably at it) but the difference for me it has some truly great moments whereas Octopussy is a real cure for insomnia once Bond takes off in his Aerostar jet.
 

Worth

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
5,248
Real Name
Nick Dobbs
The main problem with Octopussy is its coming off of one of the best (and most highly underrated IMHO) Bonds in the shape of For Your Eyes Only which demonstrated that Moore's Bond didn't need to have that "lighter touch" he insisted on for most of his run. Although to be fair, the style whiplash isn't as bad with Octopussy as it is with the film that immediately proceeded FYEO.

Now you can say the same thing about Spectre (how they deliberately tried to make Skyfall II and failed miserably at it) but the difference for me it has some truly great moments whereas Octopussy is a real cure for insomnia once Bond takes off in his Aerostar jet.

I'll take Moonraker and Octopussy over For your Eyes Only any day. For all of its silliness, Moonraker is at least of a piece, while Eyes lurches back and forth between broad comedy and serious thriller from scene to scene, and Glen is nowhere near expert enough a director to handle the sudden shifts in tone. It has its moments, but Eyes also lacks Moonraker's epic scale and saving graces - Jean Tournier's lush photography, Ken Adam's awesome sets and John Barry's majestic score.
 

Robin9

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
7,675
Real Name
Robin
I cannot get past Denise Richards being cast as a nuclear physicist in that one -- probably the second worst Bond girl casting after Tonya Roberts as a geologist in A View To a Kill.

Well, each to their own etc. I don't have a problem with her. After all, plausibility is not what James Bond films are all about.:)
 

George_W_K

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2003
Messages
2,031
Location
Ohio
Real Name
George
So I just watched this a second time and I have to say I liked it a lot better than the first time.

After I watched it the first time, I bought the 50 Anniversary set and watched all 23 previous films and finally SPECTRE again tonight. I'm wondering if the reason I liked this better was because my other Bond viewings were so recent compared to the couple of years gap from Skyfall to bluray SPECTRE release (when I first watched it).

I'm not a huge fan of the opening song, but I also don't think it's the worst.

I do wish they had recycled less of the Skyfall soundtrack and played more orchestration of the opening title like the older movies would do.

As for the bluray, I'm pleased with the audio, there was some really nice LFE moments and I especially liked the use of surrounds when Bond and Dave Bautista were fighting on the train.

Video was mostly clear, but the black levels were elevated. I wonder if that was the look they were going for but the black bars were black and the dark scenes were a lot grayer (brownish-gray?) than they were. I think the film would have looked better with better blacks, but if that was the director's intent, I'm fine with it.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,007
Messages
5,128,240
Members
144,228
Latest member
CoolMovies
Recent bookmarks
0
Top