Lee Scoggins
Senior HTF Member
http://online.wsj.com/public/us
I will try to find more details as additional stories cross the wire.
I will try to find more details as additional stories cross the wire.
Time Warner is trying to sell its music assets to pay down debt, and if Time Warner CEO Dick Parsons believes he has little chance to get regulatory approval for an EMI deal, he could move toward selling the division to a private equity group headed by Edgar Bronfman Jr.Very interesting....
And if Warner/EMI combine in some fashion (or try to depending on regulators) do we see the Beatles catalog on DVDA?
Then you have two big SACD parties and 2 big DVDA parties? and Universal on the fence with both?
lots of interesting possibilities...
It's bad enough having 5 huge sloth-like companies dominating the music business, the spectre of having that power concentrated to fewer companies is bad for consumers, IMO.You may very well be right, but it appears that no one's music division was making money and maybe the combination will ensure a better (at least financially) business model for music.
I thought about something else this morning:
Maybe this merger helps hirez by creating bigger support of both formats...? For instance, music alliances may add to profitability by rationalizing distribution lines and that may help free investment cash for hirez....also maybe a bigger company focusing on hirez titles leads to a more focused marketing effort and effort to do bigger name albums-ie. more clout for talking to artists/groups like the Beatles.
Just some food for thought...
Interesting market share numbers at the bottom. Universal remains at #1 even after the merger.Not necessarily. Those numbers are for 2001 and 2002.
If you add the 2002 market share numbers, worldwide, for SONY and BMG, you get a number that is slightly larger than Universal's worldwide market share alone.
In the domestic US, it would seem that Universal may still hold on to the #1 share.
Independent record labels have always been the mainstay of innovation for the past 40 years.That should not change with this JV. Most independents doing quality work like Chesky, Telarc, Reference/Dorian are not part of the Big 5, er 4. Also, some big music companies can preserve the small company atmosphere and A&R that leads to quality work. Witness Blue Note's recent artist hits like Norah Jones...
The grand scheme is what really matters, and it definitely isn't positive.I am not so sure. In this case, the music industry is so financially in the dog house, that improved business models from the JV may be in fact a good thing.
Christina Aguilera, Backstreet Boys, Patrick Bruel, Busta Rhymes, The Calling, Nick Carter, The Chieftains, Kenny Chesney, Dave Matthews Band, Dido, Foo Fighters, Whitney Houston, Alan Jackson, Jars of Clay, R. Kelly, Alicia Keys, Avril Lavigne, Annie Lennox, *NSYNC, Kazumasa Oda, Pink, Elvis Presley, Eros Ramazzotti, Santana, Michael W. Smith, Britney Spears, Rod Stewart, Third Day, Justin Timberlake, TLC, Diego Torres, Usher, Luther Vandross, WestlifeNothing of interest to me personally in this list, except perhaps a Santana record or two.
I was looking at the North America numbers.
But if you add BMG and Sony on a worldwide basis, you still have Universal at #1. 25.2 for BMG/Sony versus 25.9 for UniversalDUH! You are correct. I have no idea what I was looking at. :b
I stand corrected.