Jeff Meininger
Second Unit
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2002
- Messages
- 481
Jack: I'm seriously considering changing plans and going up to the tempest instead of the shiva. The larger enclosure hasn't passed the SAF test yet, but it might.
In post #7 you say that 120 Hz might be too high for a crossover with a Tempest, which I believe. Dan @ Adire told me in an email, though, that the tempest is clean to 400 Hz and I shouldn't have a problem. The whitepaper says there is a driver breakup mode at 300, and that the tempest should be kept under 250 Hz. I'm having trouble distilling this information into a "yes, it will work" or "no, it's too high" answer.
Can the shiva do it better? If it can, and a 150L enclosure is okay with my wife, would I be better served by a vented shiva since my room gain isn't going to be stellar? I installed windows (ugh) and looked at lspcad, and the average group delay of the adire alignment sub is at the peak of the sealed. About an order of magnitude higher, I think. But I wonder if I'll be able to tell one way or another... I've read that the difference in "tightness" between a well-designed ported sub and a sealed sub is inaudible.
My primary goal is to blend as smoothly as possible with my small mains. I really don't understand which aspects of sub design make for seamless blending.
In post #7 you say that 120 Hz might be too high for a crossover with a Tempest, which I believe. Dan @ Adire told me in an email, though, that the tempest is clean to 400 Hz and I shouldn't have a problem. The whitepaper says there is a driver breakup mode at 300, and that the tempest should be kept under 250 Hz. I'm having trouble distilling this information into a "yes, it will work" or "no, it's too high" answer.
Can the shiva do it better? If it can, and a 150L enclosure is okay with my wife, would I be better served by a vented shiva since my room gain isn't going to be stellar? I installed windows (ugh) and looked at lspcad, and the average group delay of the adire alignment sub is at the peak of the sealed. About an order of magnitude higher, I think. But I wonder if I'll be able to tell one way or another... I've read that the difference in "tightness" between a well-designed ported sub and a sealed sub is inaudible.
My primary goal is to blend as smoothly as possible with my small mains. I really don't understand which aspects of sub design make for seamless blending.