What's new

Solution for studios (& fans) regarding low-selling shows... (1 Viewer)

todd s

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 8, 1999
Messages
7,132
After reading the transcript of the Warner chat. I saw a lot of shows that will not see future releases because of low sales. How about doing what Amazon is doing with some cartoon shows...Burn on demand. Say a show like Superboy. Its not feasible to release future seasons. How about working a deal with Amazon and do burn on demand? This seems to be the best way to satisfy both the fan and the studio accountants.
 

Robert13

Supporting Actor
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Messages
755
Real Name
Robert
I'm all for it. I've loved the idea since I first read about it. I think more studios can get their properties out there this way. If they are going to do this, I would offer several seasons at once though. Here is my list of hopeful "burn on demand" titles for studios...

SONY
The Facts Of Life
Hart to Hart
Hazel
What's Happening Now!!
Diff'rent Strokes
One in a Million
Archie Bunker's Place
Gloria

WARNER
She's The Sheriff
Alice
Mama's Family

CBS/PARAMOUNT
Bagdad Café
Laverne & Shirley
Life With Lucy

UNIVERSAL
Gimme a Break!

htf_images_smilies_smile.gif
 

David Levine

Supporting Actor
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
502
It's a very good idea in that it eliminates manufacturing, shipping and returns. I'd think it would work well with "easy" shows.

Unfortunately it doesn't address things like music clearance or other legal issues (like in the Superboy example and with the battle over ownership of that particular name).
 

AndyMcKinney

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Messages
3,188
Location
Kentucky, USA
My big problem with "burn on demand" (apart from not having a fast enough internet connection) is the fact you'd be archiving them on "burnt" media, which we all know is much more prone to failure after getting a small scratch, getting coughed on (kidding), etc.

What happens if that on-demand DVD-R you burnt 6-12 months ago is now no longer readable? You get a "free" do-over? I doubt it. I just hate the idea of paying for the "right" to put something on an unstable type of media. I much prefer the machine-pressed discs.
 

nikkif99uk

Supporting Actor
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
985
Real Name
Nikki Fineing

You don't need a fast internet connection. Amazon burns it and sends it to you in apparently according to reviews some pretty nice packaging.

Agree about lifespan of the discs though
 

DeWilson

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2006
Messages
2,517
Real Name
Denny
Here we go again about the "bugaboo" about burned media.

Folks, it's the QUALITY of the media NOT the overall technology!

The current "burn-on-demand" companies (and MOST of the underground stuff!) are using low-cost media that is sometimes poorly made just to save pennies.

All media isn't equal - it's down to the type of dyes used,the reflective surface and the quality control of the manfuacturing of the media.

Again, one of the BEST reads on the subject is at

digitalFAQ.com | Blank Video Media Quality Guide

As for "burning on demand" - you're only taking away the manufacturing costs which are minimal per unit. You still have the same licencing and royalty issues,mastering issues and so on.
 

John DeAngelis

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
175
Real Name
John DeAngelis
Another option would be slightly higher-priced limited-availability DVD releases, the equivalent of Rhino Handmade and Hip-o Direct's CD releases.
 

AndyMcKinney

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Messages
3,188
Location
Kentucky, USA

I agree with you that there are differing qualities of media, but surely you're not suggesting that a "burnt" disc on a "good" blank is going to be 100% (or nearly) as sturdy, reliable, resistant to becoming a coaster after scratches, etc. as a proper, machine-pressed DVD, when past experience would seem to indicate otherwise.
 

David Levine

Supporting Actor
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
502

Yes to the 2nd, no to the first.

The big thing you are saving companies is returns and excess inventory. Retailers still overorder, and when something underperforms most of it goes back to the studio. That's why you see so many recent DVDs in Wal-Mart's dump bin and so many 3.00 DVDs at Big Lots. TV on DVD is a lot more expensive to produce, so it's harder to just take a huge loss on it.

The major studios have literally millions (and in some cases, I've heard over a billion) of DVDs in excess inventory and the shareholders don't like seeing all that red on the ledgers. And with TV on DVD being so hit or miss, it's no wonder studios are gunshy about having to way overproduce sets that are potential bombs.

Burn on Demand is far from perfect, but it eliminates that huge pitfall.
 

TV_Fan

Second Unit
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
355
Real Name
Chris H

Would this also explain the sales retailers constantly have like Best Buy & Amazon? I got nervous last year when I saw Fall Guy on sale at Best for like $20 very shortly after it came out and was retailing at like $60. Apparently I had good reson to be worried, because I have yet to hear word of a 2nd season being released.
Best Buy & Wal Mart also sell a lot of DVDs for $13 but mostly ones that have been out for awhile like the early seasons of All In The Family & The Jeffersons.
 

David Levine

Supporting Actor
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
502

Absolutely. Go into a Best Buy on street date and you'll see 30 copies of a marginal studio new release. You know that one is going to be in a 9.99 sale with a month or 2 and it'll likely be a 4.99 title in as little as a few months.

A lot of times studios would rather "take the hit" than take the return.
 

Mark Talmadge

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
2,379
The MPAA would never go for that in the first because there is too much temptation for piracy and what happens when someone, who has purchased a complete season and has burned it to a DVD wants to sell those shows they bought as "Burn on Demand" on such auction sites as eBay?

The MPAA is very outspoken when it comes to burned media and I doubt they would allow something like this to go forward.

Not only that, but the entertainment industry would be leaving out a very large customer support base. What do you about those famnilies who don't have internet access ... it really limits the profits that studios could receive from such an endeavor.
 

James Sajdak

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
70
I think Burn-On-Demand is a great idea. I first read about it about a year ago and thought it would be a great solution to getting obsecure and semi-unpopular content on DVD.

If I'm not mistaken I believe that right now when clearing music and other rights for a release they pay an upfront cost to a particular person or persons. With the burn on demand technology if they could strike some sort of a deal to pay the licensing costs if and when a copy sells.

I think to make the MPAA happy all they would have to do is add one of the DVD copy protection techniques and a region code to the disc. I think that both of there are capable of being done in the DVD Authoring software.
 

HenryDuBrow

Screenwriter
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
1,517
Real Name
Henry.
With burn-on-demand, could we have every, say, Warner show to choose from or only a selected few? I mean, it's the more rarer shows we'd be interested in anyway, but maybe rights issues play into it too, leaving not everything doable.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,016
Messages
5,128,521
Members
144,245
Latest member
thinksinc
Recent bookmarks
0
Top