There is no such thing as "single lens Cinerama". Those movies (except for Patton which was actually in a rebranded Todd-AO but without the wide-angle lens designed to make use of its curve) were all shot Super Panavision 70 flat or Ultra Panavision anamorphic with the prints being either hard rectified or soft in the projector. Since the curve wasn't a factor in the filmmaking process the image is just distorted for the sake of distortion.Patton was D-150 on a curved screen and the others were single lens Cinerama.
Lord Dalek is correct. It's a Mad(X4) World and Khartoum were shot in Ultra Panavision 70, 2001 and Grand Prix were shot it Super Panavision 70, and Patton was Super Panavision 70 with a D150 lens for selected scenes. Special rectified prints were created for all these films to be shown in the Cinerama venue, but that is not how they were created.Patton was D-150 on a curved screen and the others were single lens Cinerama. I am no expert on the subject,but the curved screen effect would be interesting to see. I guess I need to get a curved screen TV [not really]
Rectified?
The cameras used were the same as used for Todd AO-Mitchells not Panavison.Patton was Super Panavision 70 with a D150 lens for selected scenes. ]
.
The cameras used were the same as used for Todd AO-Mitchells not Panavison.
Further from detailed coverage of the filming on Patton, D150 lenses were used through out save for the famous wide angle which only became available near the end of filming.
Robert Harris, I think referred to these lenses as some of the finest glass ever used on a camera so lets give credit where it is due and not to Panavision. They had nothing to do with the photography on Patton.
Only the films shot in UP70 had Rectified Prints the ones shot in Super Panavision 70 did not.Lord Dalek is correct. It's a Mad(X4) World and Khartoum were shot in Ultra Panavision 70, 2001 and Grand Prix were shot it Super Panavision 70, and Patton was Super Panavision 70 with a D150 lens for selected scenes. Special rectified prints were created for all these films to be shown in the Cinerama venue, but that is not how they were created.
There is no such thing as "single lens Cinerama". Those movies (except for Patton which was actually in a rebranded Todd-AO but without the wide-angle lens designed to make use of its curve) were all shot Super Panavision 70 flat or Ultra Panavision anamorphic with the prints being either hard rectified or soft in the projector. Since the curve wasn't a factor in the filmmaking process the image is just distorted for the sake of distortion.
Thank you for restating what I just posted without defending the fact that it was completely fake. Hell you could optically distort any 70mm blow up from the 70s and it would be screen accurate to how these movies were presented at the Pacific CineramadomeSingle Lens Cinerama filmed in Super Panavision, Todd-AO, Technirama, and MCS-70.
Thank you for restating what I just posted without defending the fact that it was completely fake. Hell you could optically distort any 70mm blow up from the 70s and it would be screen accurate to how these movies were presented at the Pacific Cineramadome
Another example. Here's 2001:If you want to see how Todd AO looks like in Smilebox, watch Holiday in Spain.
Smilebox is great for "proper" Cinerama but not 70mm.