Shall we Marantz? A Piece from the Past

Discussion in 'Archived Threads 2001-2004' started by Bill Kane, Apr 23, 2002.

  1. Bill Kane

    Bill Kane Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2001
    Messages:
    1,359
    Likes Received:
    0
    A friend bestowed on me a cast-off 1980s Marantz AM/FM Stereo Receiver, from the Quadraphonic era. Museum piece?

    According to the manual it's the top-of-the-line Model 2270, 70watts per channel solidstate, THD 0.3%, -80dB Noise, R/L Main In/Preouts, two VU signal strength meters, and tape deck capable. It weighs 38 lbs. Whew...

    Wish I'd had this Back Then, but now it's just out in the garage and I haven't tried to fire it up.

    I can't think of anything to do with this, except maybe in a second-room application, which I don't need. It this just a dust-catcher nowadays?
     
  2. Jin E

    Jin E Second Unit

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2000
    Messages:
    452
    Likes Received:
    0
    I set up a "vintage" system for shits and grins. YOu can do the same youself. You can usually pick up the peices pretty cheap from estate auctions, pawn shops, and sometimes Ebay. Of course... the stuff during the 80's was pretty ugly looking. Check out the vintage Kenwoods I have from th late 70's. I went with asthetics instead of performance for mine. I have a silver faces Kenwood int-amp, matching Kenwood tunerm and silver Pioneer turntable. They really do look nice together, and add a bit of flair to the bedroom. You can see my two Kenwood Int-amps here before I movd the bottom one to the back bedroom.
    [​IMG]
     
  3. Bill Balcziak

    Bill Balcziak Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 1999
    Messages:
    871
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  4. Allen W

    Allen W Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2001
    Messages:
    62
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bill I think you might be impressed with how it good it sounds when you fire it up. There are alot of fans of the classic Marantz and silver faced Kenwoood pieces around.
     
  5. Bill Balcziak

    Bill Balcziak Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 1999
    Messages:
    871
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have no doubt they look and sound great (my first receiver was a 1979-vintage Pioneer SX-3700 and I still pine for that blue fluorescent display!).
    I was chuckling at the (supposedly unintended) double entendre in Jin's post. [​IMG]
     
  6. Jack Briggs

    Jack Briggs Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 1999
    Messages:
    16,738
    Likes Received:
    129
    The 2270 was not a "classic" or vintage Marantz product in any way. It was manufactured by Superscope in Japan, long after Saul Marantz had sold the company off to mid-fi interests. At the time, only a handful of "real" Marantz products were still being hand-assembled in the U.S.: the Models 250 and 500 power amplifiers, the 3300 preamplifier, and the Model 1200 integrated amplifier. Everything else was built by Superscope.

    Marantz sold his company in 1963.

    The true classics you want to find are the legendary Model 7 vacuum tube preamp, the Models 8 and 9 power amplifiers, the Model 10 FM tuner, and such.
     
  7. Bill Kane

    Bill Kane Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2001
    Messages:
    1,359
    Likes Received:
    0
    well, this 2207 is NOT coming into my house. Unless I unearth the ol' turntable and monaural LPs. Fat chance. RIP.

    I've already run out of space/room.
     
  8. Jack Briggs

    Jack Briggs Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 1999
    Messages:
    16,738
    Likes Received:
    129
    Well, the 2270 was a sturdy little unit pumping out good power for a receiver in its day.

    By the way, the top-of-the-line Marantz stereo receiver of that era--and another of the "real" Marantz products being manufactured at the time--was the Model 19 stereophonic receiver, which was also handcrafted (it featured a tiny oscilloscpe on the front panel for FM signal-strength detection!).

    Though the 2270 pumped out a rated 70 watts into 8 ohms at all frequencies with both channels driven, the much, much more expensive Model 19 provided 50 watts per channel.
     
  9. Scott Strang

    Scott Strang Screenwriter

    Joined:
    May 28, 1999
    Messages:
    1,145
    Likes Received:
    4
    Hey Jin

    I lust after those vintage Kenwoods. Beautiful gear. Sure they're mid-fi, but still very easy on the eyes.
     
  10. KeithH

    KeithH Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2000
    Messages:
    9,413
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jack said:

     
  11. Jack Briggs

    Jack Briggs Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 1999
    Messages:
    16,738
    Likes Received:
    129
    Keith: In what shape are those devices? Describe their condition. Seriously. You have, shall we say, "fine wine" in your house. Please do tell all.

    Everybody: Something I forgot to mention earlier--as best as I recall (and I recall well, having owned "real" Marantz equipment), the 2270 receiver is of early 1970s vintage. I know. I decided against purchasing one, going instead for the "real stuff": a Model 3300 preamplifier and Model 500 power amplifier combination.
     
  12. Bill Kane

    Bill Kane Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2001
    Messages:
    1,359
    Likes Received:
    0
    1970s? Well, I thought the tip-off was that the 2207 is a quadraphonic receiver/amp.
    Of course I Rip Van Winkled the entire quad era, so I really don't know!
     
  13. Jin E

    Jin E Second Unit

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2000
    Messages:
    452
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thought I should mention... I just sold off the Phono and speakers in the back bedroom. Back down to 1 system for me [​IMG]
    The Kenwood from the bedroom will now power my outdoor speakers (the new Marantz did not have A/B speaker outputs). I'm using my other kenwood to power my SVS 25-31 with excellent results. I am curious what the SVS would do with more then 75 watts of power though!
     
  14. Jack Briggs

    Jack Briggs Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 1999
    Messages:
    16,738
    Likes Received:
    129
    Bill: Even I am getting confused. All along, I thought your were referring to the 2270 receiver--a two-channel device of good repute, but just not the "real" thing. But the Superscope-driven company had plunged headlong--along with almost the rest of the misguided industry--into quad. And quad was a strictly 1972-through-early 1975 disaster, the audio equivalent of "New Coke."
     
  15. Bill Kane

    Bill Kane Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2001
    Messages:
    1,359
    Likes Received:
    0
    ok Jack, dont be confused -- I am.

    Yes, this is a Superscope Marantz and it IS Stereo, not quadraphonic. The second set/pair of speaker outs is for a REMOTE ap I now see, not "New Coke" quad. So what year-vintage might it be?
     
  16. KeithH

    KeithH Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2000
    Messages:
    9,413
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jack, my brother said that when he last used the Marantz components about 18 months ago, they worked fine. He had them on the floor of a carpeted closet until he gave them to me. I don't have them in front of me as they still are at my parents' house, but they look to be in good condition. The tubes on the pre-amp (inserted in the back panel) look a bit dusty, but they can be cleaned. Of course, to clean them, I have to figure out how to remove them (if they need to be removed to be cleaned). The tubes are surrounded by what looks to me like some sort of strange coils. Granted, I really haven't taken the time to play with these components much. I feel I have some real audio jewels there, but I need the time to get them here and play with them to see exactly what I have. I know they are classics.
     
  17. Jack Briggs

    Jack Briggs Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 1999
    Messages:
    16,738
    Likes Received:
    129
    Keith: I'll give you a really, really good deal. How about $50 each? No kidding, man. Seriously. PM me immediately and we will work out the logistics! [​IMG]
    Bill: I would be willing to bet your receiver was manufactured in either 1972 or 1973. The model, I don't think, was available after that. But, by then, I was already fixating on other equipment--Audio Research and such. By then, I had gone mad, cascading down the misguided waterfall that is "high end" audio.
     

Share This Page