Joseph Howard
Stunt Coordinator
- Joined
- Sep 10, 1997
- Messages
- 227
Ok, what is the deal exactly?
Battlestar Galactica (original series) was, looking back
through nostalgia colored glasses, an enjoyable show. Sure,
it was often campy but it had some undefinable charm that
made me watch and enjoy it. I liked the characters and the
chemistry of the show. In fact, today in reruns I still
do. I wasn't too upset when it was prematurely cancelled,
but I did feel like it still had some story to tell.
Then came the hastily thrown together "Galactica 1980."
What a freakin abomination. I've been watching the mini-
marathon on scifi the last day and today and viewing with
mouth agape and remembering in horror the show and my
feelings the first time I saw it 24 years ago.
Why is it so bad in comparison to the original series?
Hmmm.... let me count the ways....
Galactica 1980 is bad because...
1. It preaches in every story line. (nazis, pollution,
nuclear power....etc)
2. It is more "stupid hi-jinx" than scifi/ scifantasy
3. No freekin character developement nor chemistry.
4. Dr. Zee.... good lord....
5. Time Travel....what the hell...
6. Outside shots all always in the same field...over and over.
7. Reuse of stock footage.... (same special effect
shots from the first Battlestar Galactica series...to
save money.... using scenes from the movie "Earthquake"
with Cylon ships superimposed over it...eek)
8. Invisibility.....
9. Freeze Ray... zap people still...
10. The Rag-Tag fleet passes Earth so Cylons don't destroy
it, but somehow shuttles and ships keep going back and
forth.
11. Super Scouts.
12. Lorne Greene... clearly dying for his love of the
original series....
All I can say is....
So, why do you think it is horrid horrid horrid TV?
And, yet,... I'm still watching it. ...shocking...
Dr. Joe
Battlestar Galactica (original series) was, looking back
through nostalgia colored glasses, an enjoyable show. Sure,
it was often campy but it had some undefinable charm that
made me watch and enjoy it. I liked the characters and the
chemistry of the show. In fact, today in reruns I still
do. I wasn't too upset when it was prematurely cancelled,
but I did feel like it still had some story to tell.
Then came the hastily thrown together "Galactica 1980."
What a freakin abomination. I've been watching the mini-
marathon on scifi the last day and today and viewing with
mouth agape and remembering in horror the show and my
feelings the first time I saw it 24 years ago.
Why is it so bad in comparison to the original series?
Hmmm.... let me count the ways....
Galactica 1980 is bad because...
1. It preaches in every story line. (nazis, pollution,
nuclear power....etc)
2. It is more "stupid hi-jinx" than scifi/ scifantasy
3. No freekin character developement nor chemistry.
4. Dr. Zee.... good lord....
5. Time Travel....what the hell...
6. Outside shots all always in the same field...over and over.
7. Reuse of stock footage.... (same special effect
shots from the first Battlestar Galactica series...to
save money.... using scenes from the movie "Earthquake"
with Cylon ships superimposed over it...eek)
8. Invisibility.....
9. Freeze Ray... zap people still...
10. The Rag-Tag fleet passes Earth so Cylons don't destroy
it, but somehow shuttles and ships keep going back and
forth.
11. Super Scouts.
12. Lorne Greene... clearly dying for his love of the
original series....
All I can say is....
So, why do you think it is horrid horrid horrid TV?
And, yet,... I'm still watching it. ...shocking...
Dr. Joe