Jeff Kleist
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 1999
- Messages
- 11,266
Yes, Indy is virtually 100% positive .The ad materials have already started to sneak out.
...Of course, Spielberg just might do a new cut of the film with deleted footage...Yikes...I hope not. This film should not be tampered with, IMHO.
I'm guessing none of you have owned laserdiscs in the past. I still own quite a few laserdiscs.I bow to your superior... um... ownership of laserdiscs. But how is that relevent to whether or not Universal can fit Schindler's List on a single DVD?
If the idea is to try and present the movie as was intended, that includes proper aspect ratio, proper sound mix, B&W or color, and proper number of interruptions (in most cases, zero).I'm truly not trying to be sarcastic, but if this is the case, wouldn't you also have to see this on a movie theater sized screen, because that's how it's intended to be seen? I've got a 65" widescreen Mits in a dedicated home theater room, but it's definitely not the same (but I love it anyway). I think the operative word here is "try". If they can't get the optimal video quality by squeezing it on one disc, then two is fine with me. My DVD player is only 8.574 feet (give or take a thousandth of an inch) from where my butt rests on my couch, so it's not too inconvenient. I just pretend that this is the portion of the movie where I have to yell at the idiot with the cell phone or the squalling baby.
Again, not trying to be sarcastic, but this is like saying that you won't watch a foreign film unless you know the language. Of course you don't do this, you compromise by watching the film with subtitles, definitely not the way it was intended. If not, good luck with the new Mel Gibson movie about the crucifixion unless you know both Aramaic and Latin.
Why not put the extras on the second disc and put the DTS and DD 5.1 on a dual layer disc 1?As has been discussed in this thread ad nauseum, a 197-minute movie with both Dolby Digital and DTS audio tracks will not fit on a single disc without compromising picture quality.
JFK had a good picture, was 205 minutes and fit on 1 disc (without DTS).Apples and oranges. It didn't have a DTS track, which makes it an invalid comparison. Add to that the fact that different types of pictures compress differently. There's a certain amoutn of intentional grain in "Schindler's List," which will be difficult to compress compared to some other pictures.
I've said this in other threads: None of us have ever authored a DVD. Why don't we assume that Steven Spielberg might know a little more about the process than we do and give him the benefit of the doubt? Hmmm?
How utterly ridiculous it is for people to complain about a release being 2 discs.Hey, I'm buying this title no matter what, but the fact is that I can barely tell the difference between DD and DTS on most discs, and I have a decent surround sound system (nothing compared to many here, though). I'm not going to be crying if this does end up on 2 discs, but if I had my choice, I'd rather skip the DTS track and the annoyance of changing the disc. Some people might not mind, but personally, I got a little tired of that with my copies of this movie and the Godfather on VHS. Never owned a LD player, but rest assured, I've been switching tapes for years. It's a pet peeve, what can I say?