Scaramouche - Widescreen - Since When?

Discussion in 'DVD' started by Joe Caps, Jul 10, 2003.

  1. Joe Caps

    Joe Caps Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2000
    Messages:
    1,994
    Likes Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Over at dVD review that have a new review of the Warner release. I have seen this film many times in revival houses and it has always been 1:33.
    Criterion always tries to release everything in the original aspect ratio and their laser of scramouche was full screen. What gives here?
     
  2. Brandon Conway

    Brandon Conway captveg

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2002
    Messages:
    8,770
    Likes Received:
    1,459
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    North Hollywood, CA
    Real Name:
    Brandon Conway
  3. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    31,340
    Likes Received:
    6,594
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    Yes, the dvd has the film in it's OAR. Another example of checking multiple sources before jumping the gun.




    Crawdaddy
     
  4. Bill Burns

    Bill Burns Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    May 13, 2003
    Messages:
    747
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I can also confirm that it's presented in its correct ratio (which I think is 1.37:1, so it's probably 1.33:1, in fact, for home video), and in a beautiful print to boot, lovingly suggesting the three-strip original.
     
  5. Steve_Ch

    Steve_Ch Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2001
    Messages:
    978
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yep, it's OAR non wide and yep, it's beautiful and I am very pleasantly surprised.
     
  6. Joe Caps

    Joe Caps Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2000
    Messages:
    1,994
    Likes Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Yikes! Thanks for the information. Did dvdreview even bother to look at the disc. they mention the widescreen transfer IN the review and in the listing of features at the top they list a 1.85 to 1 transfer!!
     
  7. GlennH

    GlennH Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 1998
    Messages:
    2,132
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    110
    Real Name:
    Glenn
    Not only did Guido at dvdreview say it's anamorphic 1.85:1, but he also says the print quality isn't so good, which doesn't match everyone else's take on it. So what in the world was he looking at?
     
  8. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    31,340
    Likes Received:
    6,594
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert

    Maybe, he had a time lapse and thought he was watching the LD instead of this newly released dvd?????[​IMG] However, even the LD was in it's OAR and not widescreen. Perhaps, he thought he was watching "Knights of the Round Table", now I have to play my dvd of that title to confirm the video quality of it since I know that title's is widescreen.[​IMG]






    Crawdaddy
     
  9. TonyD

    TonyD Who do we think I am?
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 1999
    Messages:
    17,391
    Likes Received:
    519
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Gulf Coast
    Real Name:
    Tony D.
    from dvdreview


     

Share This Page