Tony Casler
Agent
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2003
- Messages
- 43
Anyone know a good place for imports? I would like to get Korn, since it doesn't seem to be headed for a U.S. release anytime soon.
In addition to Blonde on Blonde, five additional Dylan SACDs will also now appear in 5.1 Multichannel format. These albums are Another Side of Bob Dylan, Bringing It All Back Home, Blood On the Tracks, Slow Train Coming, Love and Theft.First, the key to the 60s era Dylan titles, the "digital holy grail" as it were, is to finally get those albums in the mono mix that Dylan carefully worked on and preferred. Obviously the stereo mix should also be included.
But multichannel "Bringing it All Back Home" and multichannel "Another Side of Bob Dylan" and multichannel "Blonde on Blonde"? I'm sorry, but that's fucking stupid. Yes, yes, it might be halfway interesting, and yes, yes, I hope to be eating my hat this summer as I proclaim how wrong I was in this post... but I'll believe that when I hear it, and no matter what it certainly appears that we won't be hearing the mono mixes on SACD (or any other digital format save CD-R burned from vinyl).
To make an absurd situation nearly sublimely ridiculous, at least three of the other Dylan SACDs being released as stereo-only were released with a quad LP mix in the 70s! Namely, "Desire", "Nashville Skyline" and "Planet Waves". So, just like the mono mixes for the earlier albums, we are losing another important (though admittedly less so) historic mix in the quads.
I find these choices to be largely without aesthetic or historic merit, and as I consider these to be the most important records yet brought to SACD, it upsets me even more to see them done from what I can only call an ignorant, ahistorical perspective. I mean, can anyone explain to me the logic behind some of these choices?
I wonder if anyone can comment on two recent SACD releases? Namely, Chick Corea, et al. "Rendezvous in New York: Live"Rich, I got the Chick Corea set on Tuesday. I have done more casual listening rather than critical listening, but I can easily say that I prefer disc 2 to disc 1, simply because of the fact that I find the Bobby McFerran tracks a little bit annoying, but they are growing on me.
The performances are first rate...very jazzy. I was surprised by this because my limited experience with Corea has been more of the contemporary jazz stylings, not the pure ad lib type jazz approach. The sound quality is truly amazing. On a par with the Alison Krauss discs, especially in the percussion, which has an extremely three dimentional soundstage. The crowd is not very prominent in the recording, except in between passages and during transitions in the music.
It's a package I highly recommend if that type of music is your cup of tea. All of my comments refer to a 2.1 setup, as I don't have a multichannel setup at this time (hopefully soon).
Yeah, what we really need is whiz-bang surround mixes on classic '60s Bob Dylan albums.Keith, how do you know that the surround recordings will be gimmicky? Sony has been reasonably tastefull so far with M-C.
To make an absurd situation nearly sublimely ridiculous, at least three of the other Dylan SACDs being released as stereo-only were released with a quad LP mix in the 70s! Namely, "Desire", "Nashville Skyline" and "Planet Waves". So, just like the mono mixes for the earlier albums, we are losing another important (though admittedly less so) historic mix in the quads.Rich,
Have you heard these? I heard they were not good and the original albums were not recorded in Quad in any event. If three track or two track masters exist and room tone is added in the sides for ambience, it is likely that the new mastering will be a vast improvement.
These are some of Sony's crown jewels. I doubt they are approaching this project lightly. I bet they are talking to Dylan and his engineers.