Both are $2000 retail, with the Rotel of course having the upper hand in power (I beleive the Parasound is underated) Can someone give me some feedback on these two. I beleive the parasound has a 10 year warrenty (not sure) Thanks!
I personally prefer warm sound and so prefer Parasound over Rotel sound. But the Rotel is an excellent amp in every which way so I dont think you would be unhappy with either. The best way is to have it in your system and listen to it yourself.
Parasound Halo's warranty is 10 years for parts, 5 years for labor. I personally don't think they sound warm at all. I have Klipsch reference 7 speakers all the way around connected to A51 and A21 Halp amps, and the sound is very neutral to me...I almost liken the sound to my Elite 45TX, which is also described as relatively neutral in tone.
Picked my Rotel RMB-1095 8weeks ago for $1550CDN(with 9yr warranty) and too me the sound is awesome. It was powering Paradigm Mini Monitors/CC350 in my setup until I sold them Tuesday. Today I get the new Studio 40,20,470 v3 today.
I recently bought a Parasound 2205A and put it to the test next to my Rotel RMB1095 before deciding which one had to go.
Soundwise these two amps do not differ that much. However the Parasound clearly wins in detail and bottom end power. The test was mostly performed in stereo on Nautilus 802 and 804 speakers, using a Meridian 568.2 and a Parasound AVC2500. Especially on the N802 the smoother and faster bass was much appreciated.
When using the amp purely for 5.1 DVD with a subwoofer, the differences are hard to notice. The Parasound A52 is based on the 2205A(T).