RIP - motion picture film cameras for movies have ceased production

Discussion in 'Movies' started by Patrick Sun, Jan 8, 2012.

  1. Patrick Sun

    Patrick Sun Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    38,717
    Likes Received:
    463
    http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/r_i_p_the_movie_camera_1888_2011/
     
  2. dpippel

    dpippel HTF Premium Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2000
    Messages:
    4,695
    Likes Received:
    1,101
    Location:
    Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems
    Real Name:
    Doug
  3. Richard--W

    Richard--W Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2004
    Messages:
    3,527
    Likes Received:
    168
    This is just awful. Awful, awful, awful.
     
  4. dmiller68

    dmiller68 Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2009
    Messages:
    667
    Likes Received:
    3
    Real Name:
    David Miller
    I'm just shocked that it took this long. I figured it has been all digital for the last few years.
     
  5. Adam Lenhardt

    Adam Lenhardt Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2001
    Messages:
    17,603
    Likes Received:
    2,117
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    It will still be a mix for a while now. There's a lot of Panavision equipment still out there owned by rental companies, and even if Kodak goes under Fujifilm will continue to make motion picture film for the foreseeable future.
     
  6. Douglas Monce

    Douglas Monce Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,514
    Likes Received:
    12
    Panavision cameras are all owned by Panavision, but your point is well taken. There are not only Panavision camera, but there are still MANY old Mitchell's that are in perfect working order, and are at least as good as the modern cameras. Doug
     
  7. dpippel

    dpippel HTF Premium Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2000
    Messages:
    4,695
    Likes Received:
    1,101
    Location:
    Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems
    Real Name:
    Doug
    Film cameras will last. The real question is how much longer will a variety of quality motion picture film stock be available? Kodak, Fujifilm, AGFA, etc. will only continue to manufacture product if it remains a profitable venture. Kodak may already be out of the picture. As more filmmakers choose to shoot digital because of conveinence, cost, functionality, aesthetics, etc., that outlook becomes less and less promising.
     
  8. Douglas Monce

    Douglas Monce Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,514
    Likes Received:
    12
    Quite true. Doug
     
  9. Bryan^H

    Bryan^H Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,075
    Likes Received:
    975
    I agree with this guy:
     
  10. Adam Gregorich

    Owner

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 1999
    Messages:
    15,754
    Likes Received:
    700
    Location:
    The Other Washington
    Real Name:
    Adam
    Interesting point about the "illusion" of movies. Great clip, thanks for sharing.
     
  11. Charles Smith

    Charles Smith Extremely Talented Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    Messages:
    5,293
    Likes Received:
    1,268
    Location:
    Nor'east
    Real Name:
    Charles Smith
    Beautiful.
     
  12. Douglas Monce

    Douglas Monce Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,514
    Likes Received:
    12
    I hate to tell him this, but digital is also just a set of still pictures taken 24 per second. They just aren't recorded on film. I saw Red Tails a few nights ago, digitally photographed, digitally projected on a 50 foot screen. It looked beautiful. In fact it was MUCH sharper and more detailed than most film prints that I see these days, and this was only 2k projection. I doubt most people who saw it would be able to tell the difference between film and digital. In fact there seems to be the common belief that movies stopped being shot on film about 10 years ago. Doug
     
  13. Greg.K

    Greg.K Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 1998
    Messages:
    1,408
    Likes Received:
    206
    Location:
    NY
    Real Name:
    Greg K.
    Yeah, I don't really get his point about the illusion of film. Film or digital, it's still just individual still frames projected sequentially.
     

Share This Page