Scott Merryfield
Senior HTF Member
Just to expand on Man, Will and Tony's comments, if you are willing to learn the basics of photography and are going to spend over $400 anyway, then a dSLR is definitely worth considering. However, if all you ever will want to do is just point the camera and take a snapshot, then you are probably better off with a small, pocket-size point & shoot camera.
There is nothing wrong about just wanting the latter. My wife, for example, has no desire to learn anything about proper exposures or operating a camera. She just wants something very portable to take a basic photo, so she has a Canon Elph camera as is very happy with that. On the other hand, I get extremely frustrated with the limitations of such a camera, and wouldn't consider using anything other than a dSLR.
If you decide to go the dSLR route, I would suggest looking at new and used options from Canon or Nikon. Those two companies dominate this market, so there are a lot more accessory options (lenses, flashes, etc.) available for these two companies -- both on the new and used market.
There is nothing wrong about just wanting the latter. My wife, for example, has no desire to learn anything about proper exposures or operating a camera. She just wants something very portable to take a basic photo, so she has a Canon Elph camera as is very happy with that. On the other hand, I get extremely frustrated with the limitations of such a camera, and wouldn't consider using anything other than a dSLR.
If you decide to go the dSLR route, I would suggest looking at new and used options from Canon or Nikon. Those two companies dominate this market, so there are a lot more accessory options (lenses, flashes, etc.) available for these two companies -- both on the new and used market.