1. Sign-up to become a member, and most of the ads you see will disappear. It only takes 30 seconds to sign up, so join the discussion today!
    Dismiss Notice

Receiver decoder vs. DVD decoder

Discussion in 'Archived Threads 2001-2004' started by Jeff Hoak, Apr 28, 2002.

  1. 1 Apr 28, 2002
    Jeff Hoak

    Jeff Hoak Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2001
    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    1) I've done some searching on this forum about this and either I'm searching on the wrong expressions or it hasn't been addressed in a while.

    2) Mods... If this is in the wrong area please feel free to move it wherever you see fit.

    The question... I have a Sony STR-DB940 and a Panasonic RP91. Both devices will decode DD 5.1 & DTS. Which should I be using to decode my DD 5.1 & DTS DVDs? More importantly. why?

    I know that using the DB940 exclusively would require only a single setup (and calibration) to listen to DVD and HDTV (supplied by my DST-3000) but an addtitonal setup (the RP91) isn't an issue for me.

    THANX!
     
  2. 2 Apr 28, 2002
    Alf S

    Alf S Banned
    BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2000
    Messages:
    3,476
    Likes Received:
    626
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Real Name:
    Alfer
    Hey Jeff,

    I believe the "standard" hook up for your situation is to use the receiver to decode. I don't really know of anyone who uses their DVD player anymore to decode 5.1. Back in the "old" days when most receivers relied on a DVD to decode stuff, many folks had no choice but use the DVD decoder.

    Now though it's probably best to let the receiver do the work. At one time DVD decoders weren't as reliable at reproducing the "best" surround effect. They are probably equal in quality now, but having to buy all the extra cables to achieve 5.1 using the DVD decoder is probably not worth the trouble or cost. Plus you always run into the chance that one of the wires or connections isn't 100% and therefore not giving you the best decoding possible. Why add one extra step in the final surround sound loop anyway.

    In my opinion, I'd stick with the simplist method, in this case, use the receiver.

    Good luck!

    Alfer
     
  3. 3 Apr 28, 2002
    Vince Maskeeper

    Vince Maskeeper Producer

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 1999
    Messages:
    6,499
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  4. 4 Apr 28, 2002
    Jeff Hoak

    Jeff Hoak Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2001
    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's probably pretty naïve but I can't seem to get past the "cost" aspect of it all.

    The receiver and the DVD cost just about the same amount. When I consider what tasks each is being asked to acomplish I can't help but believe that the DVD is bound to have the better decoder "chip-set".

    Vince,

    Thanx... The DVD-A aspect of the equation had not yet occured to me. At this point I do not own and DVD-A discs. I haven't really had any interest but I certainly hadn't ruled them out either.

    The OBVIOUS answer is to hook it up and let my ears decide. It's a shame I'm so blessed lazy...
     
  5. 5 Apr 28, 2002
    Vince Maskeeper

    Vince Maskeeper Producer

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 1999
    Messages:
    6,499
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0


    Well- certainly you have a point, especially if your receiver is valued equally with your dvd player. Actually, technically speaking, in your case- you have a higher-mid range DVD player and a lower end receiver-- so you will probably find the DVD convertors to be a little nicer... In my case, my receiver cost 3 times the price of a dvd player- so I trust it to do the work.

    But, always- trust your ears. Educated guess might lead you to believe the RP-91 convertors are better than a budget receiver- but I'd personally fiddle a bit before I made that determinations.

    -V
     
  6. 6 Nov 27, 2002
    Rory

    Rory Extra

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2002
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hi folks,

    Just want to be sure I got this right.

    I have a Denon AVR-2802 receiver and a Mitsu DD-8020 DVD player. If I use the Mitsu 5.1 analog out to the Denon ext. in (currently only used for DVD-Audio), I will be using the Mitsu DTS/Dolby decoders. If I use the Mitsu coax or optical digital out to the Denon optical/coax digital in, I will be using the Denon's DTS/Dolby decoders. Is that correct?

    I currently have both ways connected. If the above is correct, I should just use the connection that sounds best to me and leave it at that. Right?

    I just want to make sure I know what I'm doing.

    Now I'll go see if I can find answers to my "delay" questions.

    Cheers!
     
  7. 7 Nov 27, 2002
    Michael Reuben

    Michael Reuben Studio Mogul

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 1998
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    5,110
     
  8. 8 Nov 27, 2002
    Rory

    Rory Extra

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2002
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thanks for your reply.

    I'm still confused. What you're saying is that by using the Mitsu's 5.1 analog out to the Denon's 5.1 ext. analog in, I'm using the Denon's decoders? And by using the Mitsu's coax/optical digital out to the Denon's coax/optical digital in, I'm using the Mitsu's decoders? Isn't that backwards? I thought anything that goes into the external jack by-passes the decoders, tone, etc. of the Denon. Also, if my Mitsu is DVD-Audio able, and to use the DVD-Audio I must use the 5.1 analog out, wouldn't that mean it's using its own decoder?

    I'm sort of thick today.

    Happy Turkey Day!
     

Share This Page