What's new

Pre Pro and AV Recivers performance differences (1 Viewer)

Lampshader

Auditioning
Joined
Jan 9, 2007
Messages
4
Real Name
Leighton
what is the differences between a av reciver and a pre amp processor? does a decent reciever give the same performance as a pre pro and an amp?
 

John Garcia

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 24, 1999
Messages
11,571
Location
NorCal
Real Name
John
Pre/pros are generally going to sound better because all of the real estate goes to doing processing only and no compromises have to be made in the way of allocating space to amplification. Then there is the fact that you use a separate amp, which also are typically going to be more powerful than what you'll find in a receiver for the same reason, all that real estate goes to doing amplification only and with all that room, they tend to be a bit more robust comparatively. The downside is, most pre/pros don't see the typical yearly replacement cycle like receivers, so you can get stuck without the latest and greatest. However you only need to replace the processor...
 

Lampshader

Auditioning
Joined
Jan 9, 2007
Messages
4
Real Name
Leighton
thanks john, all explained. You guys are great always a quick and honnest answer.

thanks again
 

gene c

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2003
Messages
5,854
Location
Bay area, Ca
Real Name
Gene
Outlaw Audio would be perfect for a side-by-side. Their 1070 ($899) avr is 65 X7. For separates they have the 970/7075 ($1299 for both). The amp is 7 X 75. The 970 pre/pro is almost identical to the 1070, minus the amp section of course. According to the specs, the 7075 amp is better than the 1070 avr in these areas. S/N Ratio: 119db to 100db, current draw: 1200 max to 855, weight: 41lbs for just the amp to 40lbs for the avr. Even I can see the separates have the advantage but I wonder if it's a $400 one.
 

Neal_C

Second Unit
Joined
Mar 15, 2001
Messages
476
I have a pre/pro setup, but I use a receiver as the pre-amp. I have a Rotel 1055 with a 1075 amp. Why did I choose this route? Well, when I bought this stuff a couple years ago, the 1066 pre-amp was the one closest in cost to the receiver. And the differences were negligible as far as sound quality. So for a couple hundred dollars less, I got the same great Rotel audio quality plus with the receiver I got a tuner (not included in the 1066) and I still got the amp section, which while not currently in use, could power 2 rear speakers should I ever get the room to go 7.1.

So yes, in general, a pre/amp combo will sound better than a receiver. But its not always the case.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Sponsors

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
347,162
Messages
4,804,177
Members
142,014
Latest member
Gbenito
Top