PRE-EQ: SVS16-46 & POLK 650 Sub Response - any EQ'ing suggestions?

Discussion in 'Archived Threads 2001-2004' started by gomez_a, Feb 27, 2002.

  1. gomez_a

    gomez_a Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2001
    Messages:
    119
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi Folks,
    Finally got my web page up and running [​IMG] :
    http://ncstatesman.tripod.com/angelswebsite/id1.html
    Looks like I got my work cut out for me - any input would be appreciated it.
    PS - anyone know how to place the graphs on this thread - tried the IMG button, didn't work for me though [​IMG]
     
  2. gomez_a

    gomez_a Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2001
    Messages:
    119
    Likes Received:
    0
    here's my data . . .
    [​IMG]
     
  3. Wayne A. Pflughaupt

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 1999
    Messages:
    6,098
    Likes Received:
    33
    Location:
    Katy, TX
    Real Name:
    Wayne
    Gomez,

    Sorry for not responding; I've been kind of jammed up the past couple of days. I'll see if I can look at your charts tomorrow.

    Regards,

    Wayne A. Pflughaupt
     
  4. Wayne A. Pflughaupt

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 1999
    Messages:
    6,098
    Likes Received:
    33
    Location:
    Katy, TX
    Real Name:
    Wayne
    Gomez,

    I suggest putting the Polk out at the curb. As you can see (and hear, I’m sure) it’s a poor performer compared to the SVS. In addition, running the two of them together seriously messes up response; you can see that response for the SVS by itself is much better than with the with of them.

    After you get an equalizer, it will be no problem to deal with that peak at 34Hz, and you’ll have a great sounding sub.

    Regards,

    Wayne A. Pflughaupt
     

Share This Page