Steve_L_B
Stunt Coordinator
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2002
- Messages
- 133
Mando-R,
I disagree with your comments about the Sony GW. I looked at both the GW II and Samsung DLP at several dealers before I finally bought my Panny plasma, and found that they had much worse PQ due to artifacting and colorbanding issues. Also, the GWIIs black level and viewing angle limitations made its PQ much worse overall than than the Panny plasma's. I agree that there are indeed some awful looking plasmas out there (some of the Sony's come to mind), but there are also some terrific ones that can compete well with any other current display technology.
One other point, Rich never stated that there were NO motion artifacts, he said that it was "virtually a none-issue". Most people, myself included, never see objectionable motion issues (and I watch a lot of sports), so it is misleading to make it out to be a severe problem.
Everyone has their own opinions about what looks best, and that's great. As was stated previously, that's why these forums exist.
Regards,
Steve
I disagree with your comments about the Sony GW. I looked at both the GW II and Samsung DLP at several dealers before I finally bought my Panny plasma, and found that they had much worse PQ due to artifacting and colorbanding issues. Also, the GWIIs black level and viewing angle limitations made its PQ much worse overall than than the Panny plasma's. I agree that there are indeed some awful looking plasmas out there (some of the Sony's come to mind), but there are also some terrific ones that can compete well with any other current display technology.
One other point, Rich never stated that there were NO motion artifacts, he said that it was "virtually a none-issue". Most people, myself included, never see objectionable motion issues (and I watch a lot of sports), so it is misleading to make it out to be a severe problem.
Everyone has their own opinions about what looks best, and that's great. As was stated previously, that's why these forums exist.
Regards,
Steve