Chris Taplin
Grip
- Joined
- Nov 23, 1998
- Messages
- 19
Double post... Opps... ;-)
What I'm getting at, is why can't a DVD player do the same thing with a non-anamorphic letterbox movie?
A DVD player can't control the monitor. Screen modes are a function of the monitor. Perhaps using the term "aspect ratio control", as it applies to the 6200, is misleading. The 6200 isn't really controlling the aspect ratio of the image you get on the TV. In progressive mode but using the "4:3" setting on the Toshiba, the Pioneer monitor is still in full mode displaying the incoming video signal in a 16:9 screen ratio. The 6200 is performing a conversion of sorts with the 4:3 DVD image. Circuitry in the player is reformatting the 4:3 image within a 16:9 frame and adding black bars to the sides to fill the extra space. In a way, this is the reverse of what DVD player does to an enhanced transfer in 4:3 mode with downconversion. Maybe we should start referring to what the Toshiba and Panasonic progressive players do with 4:3 material as "upconversion" to be more accurate.
What I understand you would like a player to do is to reformat a 4:3 letterboxed image by "zooming" it in to fill a 16:9 frame then outputting that to the monitor in progressive mode. I don't think they can do that, at least not economically enough to put it in a reasonably priced DVD player.
Robert
What I understand you would like a player to do is to reformat a 4:3 letterboxed image by "zooming" it in to fill a 16:9 frame then outputting that to the monitor in progressive mode.
That's exactly what I want. I presently use a PC-based player to accomplish this, but would rather have an easier to use standalone player that'll do the same thing.
I fail to understand what is so difficult about this. Certainly it'll increase the cost of the player, but I'm willing to accept that -- as long as the overall cost isn't totally ridiculous (i.e. the supposed $5000 Princeton player). I could believe that the price might increase by a few hundred dollars, perhaps.