Patrick Larkin
Screenwriter
- Joined
- May 8, 2001
- Messages
- 1,759
I searched for info on this title but didn't turn anything up.
Comments on transfer, sound quality, extras?
Comments on transfer, sound quality, extras?
madonna - madonna (i know i know)
Whats wrong with Madonna? I think her music and her sexiness has gotten better with age.
As far as The Wall goes, I love this DVD and if you are a Floyd fan, there is no reason why you should not own this DVD. I forgot about the commentary. I will have to listen to it soon.
My music DVDs include:
The Wall
NIN - And All That Could Have Been: DTS (My fav)
Tool - Salival
Rage Against the Machine - The self titled DVD and The Battle of Mexico City
Dave Matthews - Listener Supported
Beastie Boys - Video Anthology
Metallica - Cunning Stunts
The Grateful Dead - Ticket to New Years and View From the Vault
Stone Temple Pilots - Core (DVD Audio)
Planet Drum - Indoscrub
-Dean-
How does one listen to the 2.0 track? With receiver in Dolby Surround mode? I hate watching movies with no center channel.
It's thread resurrection time!
I watched this for the first time in awhile last night, but before I settled in I took the time to sample the DD5.1 vs. uncompressed PCM track (in various speaker permutations for the latter). I'm sure things will be somewhat different from system to system, but this is what I've found to best:
First, both tracks are excellent. One might have hoped for a DTS surround track, but the DD and PCM are mighty fine. Either way you go you're not likely to be disappointed.
From the perspective of the music reproduction, the PCM track offers a not considerable but easily noticeable improvement in detail and timbre. The DD5.1 mix is quite good, but it certainly lacks the immediacy and presence of the uncompressed PCM track.
I found that using a surround decoding for the PCM track was better than straight stereo, providing a nicely ambient surround experience. However, the center channel was very problematic in my system, causing the front soundstage to collapse to the middle too much for my tastes. I greatly preferred running in phantom mode and taking the center channel speaker out of the mix entirely. This opened up the soundstage considerably, providing the very best playback of the music portions (at least on my system).
For dialog, it was slightly better to have the center back in the mix, but not so much as to be problematic (especially if one is occupying the sweet spot). The directional aspects of the DD-5.1 mix, mostly "sound effects" and the like, are impressive, but I found the music a tad anemic in DD.
I wonder if anyone else has a similar preference?
I wonder if anyone else has a similar preference?
I do.
The 5.1 track is very good and has an advantage with the directionality of sound effects such as bombs falling and such, but overall, I prefer to listen to the PCM track with pro-logic decoding engaged because of the noticeable (though not extreme) improvement in musical fidelity. For some reason, I frequently have to drop my center channel 2-3dB when decoding for pro-logic from PCM sources versus DD2.0. This has shown up on tests with an SPL meter, not just in my ears, but I don't really know why.
Regards,