Guardyan
Stunt Coordinator
Hmm so maybe it's the type of tape that you die 7 days after watching it.From what I've seen, it's mostly stuck-in-the-past horror movie fans that have reembraced VHS.
Hmm so maybe it's the type of tape that you die 7 days after watching it.From what I've seen, it's mostly stuck-in-the-past horror movie fans that have reembraced VHS.
Agreed. I will never understand the "nostalgia" for VHS tapes, especially now that we have so many far superior formats around - i.e. streaming/Blu-ray/DVD.Last week NYT had an article about people that are still buying VHSs. I understand that some titles never saw a DVD release and I understand people that are nostalgic. I also understand that audiophiles and their love for vinyl and the resurgence of this niche with new releases etc. But I don't understand the love for VHSs. Although I totally think some small factory should still be producing some VCRs every 5 years because a lot of people still have tapes, etc.
VHS? What's that?
Well, presumably, I'll have waaay more than enough discs (and digital titles) in my collection to worry too much about that potential day... unless something else goes wrong -- I may just give up on this hobby (that began w/ having kids and becoming much more homebound) if I somehow lose the vast majority of my collection...
_Man_
Conversely, I do completely get/understand the nostalgia for Vinyl records. I don't share in this; but, I understand why people like the larger presentation/larger artwork/larger liner notes. And, there are still some audio "purists" out there who will insist that the sound is better with vinyl than with CD/digital.
I agree with you. I'm not one of those that believe Vinyl sounds better than CD's/Digital. But, there are those that prefer them - go figure. I haven't had a Vinyl record player since 1990, and never plan on getting another one.From a technical perspective, I still don't get the fascination with vinyl.
From a non-technical perspective, I would just buy posters of the cover artwork. For example when I was younger, I had posters which had giant blown up versions of classic album cover artwork, such as Led Zeppelin, Black Sabbath, Pink Floyd, Iron Maiden, Blondie, etc ...
The simplest explanation is nostalgia. VHS reminds people of when they were younger and the "good old days" of the 1980's, etc. Personally, I have very fond memories of browsing the aisles of video stores but I have no interest in getting tapes again. I still have a functional VCR and some tapes but I certainly would be glad to see that stuff come to disc so I could dump the tapes and have the show in a better quality.Agreed. I will never understand the "nostalgia" for VHS tapes.
I agree with you. I'm not one of those that believe Vinyl sounds better than CD's/Digital. But, there are those that prefer them - go figure. I haven't had a Vinyl record player since 1990, and never plan on getting another one.
However, I do understand the preference for the larger cover art/pictures/etc. Though CD's reproduce this, it's a much smaller format so a lot of the detail is lost (or at least harder to see).
I have though about buying some re-released Vinyl records for nostalgic purposes - but it would be for display/collectible reasons only.
I've got some relatives who still have their old VCR & some VHS tapes, and I tell them that if the VCR ever breaks - it's going to be tough to find someone to fix it. And, if they do - the repair shop will probably charge as much/more for the repair than the machine is even worth - LOL.
For the most part, even TV shows/movies on VHS that haven't ever been released to DVD/Blu are available via streaming - in some capacity. Typically, the streams are no better than a VHS rip - but they are no worse, either. For example, the iconic 1977 film Looking for Mr. Goodbar (starring Diane Keaton) has never been released on Region 1 DVD/Blu. However, there are streams of the movie floating around online so anyone who wants to can see this.
Possibly; I suspect that in many of these cases it's not worth it to a potential company to remaster the TV show/film (for either a physical media release or streaming) because they feel the release wouldn't make a profit. Also, music copyright issues can be & are a huge roadblock when it comes to some older releases.For such older stuff, is this due to using old transfers made back in the day (ie. 1980s or earlier) ?
IN such cases, I wouldn't be surprised if the movie company is too lazy and/or don't want to invest in a newer modern HD or 4K (or higher) resolution transfers. (Or they're charging a premium for a newer hd/4k transfer).
The simplest explanation is nostalgia. VHS reminds people of when they were younger and the "good old days" of the 1980's, etc.
Yes. Exactly. If you look at the 1st shot of that one big rack, you see 4k copies of The Joker in the section closest to you AND in the second section. Click the image to make it larger. I checked the shelf tags under the product and they were identical.Do you mean by that that the same release could exist in multiple places/slots on that rack? I'm confused.